Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32544169›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Comparative genomics of high grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix.

R Tyler Hillman, Robert Cardnell, Junya Fujimoto, Won-Chul Lee, Jianjun Zhang, Lauren A Byers, Preetha Ramalingam, Mario Leitao, Elizabeth Swisher, P Andrew Futreal and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Integrated mutational landscape analysis of poorly differentiated high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

R Tyler HillmanDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9832-9925
Robert CardnellDepartment of Thoracic/Head & Neck Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Junya FujimotoDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Won-Chul LeeDepartment of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Jianjun ZhangDepartment of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Lauren A ByersDepartment of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Preetha RamalingamDepartment of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Mario LeitaoDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Medical Center, New York, NY, United States of America.
Elizabeth SwisherDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
P Andrew FutrealDepartment of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Michael FrumovitzDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON SPORE IN OVARIAN CANCERP50CA083639 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI BAST, ROBERT C · 1999 to 2015
$33.0M
Training of Academic Gynecologic OncologistsT32CA101642 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI ANIL K SOOD, Kathleen Schmeler · 2005 to 2026
$9.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA083639NCI NIH HHS T32 CA101642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to improve treatment selection for high grade neuroendocrine carcinomas of the cervix (NECC), we performed a comparative genomic analysis between this rare tumor type and other cervical cancer types, as well as extra-cervical neuroendocrine small cell carcinomas of the lung and bladder. We performed whole exome sequencing on fresh-frozen tissue from 15 NECCs and matched normal tissue. We then identified mutations and copy number variants using standard analysis pipelines. Published mutation tables from cervical cancers and extra-cervical small cell carcinomas were used for comparative analysis. Descriptive statistical methods were used and a two-sided threshold of P < .05 was used for significance. In the NECC cohort, we detected a median of 1.7 somatic mutations per megabase (range 1.0-20.9). PIK3CA p.E545K mutations were the most frequency observed oncogenic mutation (4/15 tumors, 27%). Activating MAPK pathway mutations in KRAS (p.G12D) and GNAS (p.R201C) co-occurred in two tumors (13%). In total we identified PI3-kinase or MAPK pathway activating mutations in 67% of NECC. When compared to NECC, lung and bladder small cell carcinomas exhibited a statistically significant higher rate of coding mutations (P < .001 for lung; P = .001 for bladder). Mutation of TP53 was uncommon in NECC (13%) and was more frequent in both lung (103 of 110 tumors [94%], P < .001) and bladder (18 of 19 tumors [95%], P < .001) small cell carcinoma. These comparative genomics data suggest that NECC may be genetically more similar to common cervical cancer subtypes than to extra-cervical small cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung and bladder. These results may have implications for the selection of cytotoxic and targeted therapy regimens for this rare disease.

Indexed as

GenomicsAdultCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineCervix UteriChromograninsClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesCohort StudiesDNA Copy Number VariationsExome SequencingFemaleGTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, GsHumansMiddle AgedMutationProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Tumor Suppressor Protein p53ChromograninsClass I Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesGNAS protein, humanGTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, GsKRAS protein, humanPIK3CA protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID32544169
PMCPMC7297329
OpenAlexW3034444120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.