Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32544158›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

First international external quality assessment scheme of nucleic acid amplification tests for the detection of Schistosoma and soil-transmitted helminths, including Strongyloides: A pilot study.

Piet Cools, Lisette van Lieshout, Rob Koelewijn, David Addiss, Sitara S R Ajjampur, Mio Ayana, Richard S Bradbury, Jason L Cantera, Daniel Dana, Kerstin Fischer and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of Each ThreeMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Piet CoolsLaboratory of Parasitology, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2980-5307
Lisette van LieshoutLeiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rob KoelewijnDutch Foundation for Quality Assessment in Medical Laboratories, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
David AddissThe Task Force for Global Health, Decatur, Georgia, United States of America.
Sitara S R AjjampurChristian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Mio AyanaJimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Richard S BradburyCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5524-506X
Jason L CanteraPATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Daniel DanaJimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Kerstin FischerWashington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2963-1303
Rubina ImtiazChildren Without Worms, Decatur, Georgia, United States of America.
Joyce KabagenyiMedical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
James LokUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
James McCarthyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Rojelio MejiaBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Zeleke MekonnenJimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Sammy M NjengaKenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Nurulhasanah OthmanUniversiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
Hongguang ShaoUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Rebecca TraubThe University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Marjan Van EsbroeckInstitute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7294-6319
Jozef VercruysseLaboratory of Parasitology, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Johnny VlaminckLaboratory of Parasitology, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Steven A WilliamsSmith College, Northampton, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4881-7496
Jaco J VerweijElisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Jaap J van HellemondDutch Foundation for Quality Assessment in Medical Laboratories, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Bruno LeveckeLaboratory of Parasitology, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are increasingly being used as diagnostic tools for soil-transmitted helminths (STHs; Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura, Necator americanus, Ancylostoma duodenale and A. ceylanicum), Strongyloides stercoralis and Schistosoma in human stool. Currently, there is a large diversity of NAATs being applied, but an external quality assessment scheme (EQAS) for these diagnostics is lacking. An EQAS involves a blinded process where test results reported by a laboratory are compared to those reported by reference or expert laboratories, allowing for an objective assessment of the diagnostic performance of a laboratory. In the current study, we piloted an international EQAS for these helminths (i) to investigate the feasibility of designing and delivering an EQAS; (ii) to assess the diagnostic performance of laboratories; and (iii) to gain insights into the different NAAT protocols used. METHODS AND PRINCIPAL

findingsA panel of twelve stool samples and eight DNA samples was validated by six expert laboratories for the presence of six helminths (Ascaris, Trichuris, N. americanus, Ancylostoma, Strongyloides and Schistosoma). Subsequently this panel was sent to 15 globally dispersed laboratories. We found a high degree of diversity among the different DNA extraction and NAAT protocols. Although most laboratories performed well, we could clearly identify the laboratories that were poorly performing. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: We showed the technical feasibility of an international EQAS for the NAAT of STHs, Strongyloides and Schistosoma. In addition, we documented that there are clear benefits for participating laboratories, as they can confirm and/or improve the diagnostic performance of their NAATs. Further research should aim to identify factors that explain poor performance of NAATs.

Indexed as

AdolescentAnimalsChildFecesFemaleHelminthiasisHelminthsHumansLaboratory Proficiency TestingMaleMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID32544158
PMCPMC7319349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.