Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32543683›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2020

Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Lori M Laffel, Lauren G Kanapka, Roy W Beck, Katherine Bergamo, Mark A Clements, Amy Criego, Daniel J DeSalvo, Robin Goland, Korey Hood, David Liljenquist and 12 more

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 218 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
218citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03263494 phase3completednot on this map

CGM Intervention in Teens and Young Adults With T1D (CITY): A Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Young Adults 14-<25 With Type 1 Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorJaeb Center for Health ResearchRan2018 to 2019Enrolled153ConditionsType 1 Diabetes MellitusArmsContinuous Glucose Monitor (CGM)
NCT04936633 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Remote Intervention by Medical Staff Based on a Cloud System of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data in Patients With Insulin-dependent Diabetes Using a Flash Sensor-based Glucose Monitoring (FSGM)

TypeinterventionalSponsorYoung Shin SongRan2021 to 2022Enrolled36ConditionsType 1 Diabetes MellitusArmsIntervention by medical staff based on a cloud system
NCT05734313 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Telemedicine-Delivered Unified Protocol for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety and Depression in Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlbert Einstein College of MedicineRan2023 to 2027Enrolled94ConditionsDiabetes, Type 1 DiabetesArmsUnified protocol for cognitive behavioral therapy (UP-CBT), Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

218 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Real-World Evidence of Automated Insulin Delivery System Use.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2022
    Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

158 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Lori M LaffelJoslin Diabetes Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lauren G KanapkaJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
Roy W BeckJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
Katherine BergamoUniversity of North Carolina Diabetes Care Center, Chapel Hill.
Mark A ClementsChildren's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri.
Amy CriegoHealth Partners Institute, International Diabetes Center, St Louis Park, Minnesota.
Daniel J DeSalvoBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Robin GolandNaomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Korey HoodStanford University, Palo Alto, California.
David LiljenquistRocky Mountain Diabetes & Osteoporosis Center, Idaho Falls, Idaho.
Laurel H Messer
Roshanak MonzaviChildren's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Thomas J MouseJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
Priya PrahaladStanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Jennifer SherrYale Children's Diabetes Program, New Haven, Connecticut.
Jill H SimmonsVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
R Paul WadwaBarbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, Aurora, Colorado.
Ruth S WeinstockSUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
Steven M WilliChildrens Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Kellee M MillerJaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.
CGM Intervention in Teens and Young Adults with T1D (CITY) Study Group
CDE10

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
SPECIAL ASSAY COREP30DK036836 · NIDDK · JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER · PI ROHIT N. KULKARNI · 1986 to 2026
$50.5M
Yale Diabetes Research CenterP30DK045735 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Kevan C Herold, GERALD I SHULMAN · 1993 to 2026
$44.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK036836NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK045735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes exhibit the worst glycemic control among individuals with type 1 diabetes across the lifespan. Although continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has been shown to improve glycemic control in adults, its benefit in adolescents and young adults has not been demonstrated. Objective: To determine the effect of CGM on glycemic control in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized clinical trial conducted between January 2018 and May 2019 at 14 endocrinology practices in the US including 153 individuals aged 14 to 24 years with type 1 diabetes and screening hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 7.5% to 10.9%. Interventions: Participants were randomized 1:1 to undergo CGM (CGM group; n = 74) or usual care using a blood glucose meter for glucose monitoring (blood glucose monitoring [BGM] group; n = 79). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in HbA1c from baseline to 26 weeks. There were 20 secondary outcomes, including additional HbA1c outcomes, CGM glucose metrics, and patient-reported outcomes with adjustment for multiple comparisons to control for the false discovery rate. Results: Among the 153 participants (mean [SD] age, 17 [3] years; 76 [50%] were female; mean [SD] diabetes duration, 9 [5] years), 142 (93%) completed the study. In the CGM group, 68% of participants used CGM at least 5 days per week in month 6. Mean HbA1c was 8.9% at baseline and 8.5% at 26 weeks in the CGM group and 8.9% at both baseline and 26 weeks in the BGM group (adjusted between-group difference, -0.37% [95% CI, -0.66% to -0.08%]; P = .01). Of 20 prespecified secondary outcomes, there were statistically significant differences in 3 of 7 binary HbA1c outcomes, 8 of 9 CGM metrics, and 1 of 4 patient-reported outcomes. The most commonly reported adverse events in the CGM and BGM groups were severe hypoglycemia (3 participants with an event in the CGM group and 2 in the BGM group), hyperglycemia/ketosis (1 participant with an event in CGM group and 4 in the BGM group), and diabetic ketoacidosis (3 participants with an event in the CGM group and 1 in the BGM group). Conclusions and Relevance: Among adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes, continuous glucose monitoring compared with standard blood glucose monitoring resulted in a small but statistically significant improvement in glycemic control over 26 weeks. Further research is needed to understand the clinical importance of the findings. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03263494.

Indexed as

AdolescentBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetic KetoacidosisFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHyperglycemiaHypoglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMobile ApplicationsMonitoring, AmbulatoryYoung AdultBlood GlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic Agents

Identifiers

PMID32543683
PMCPMC7298603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.