Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32543335›Full record

ArticleAutophagy2021

Autophagy as an on-ramp to scientific discovery.

Casey Garr, Candyce M Sturgeon, Noah Franks, Veronica A Segarra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autophagy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Casey GarrDepartment of Biology, High Point University, High Point, NC, USA 27268.
Candyce M SturgeonDepartment of Biology, High Point University, High Point, NC, USA 27268.
Noah FranksPenn Griffin School for the Arts, High Point, NC, USA 27260.
Veronica A SegarraDepartment of Biology, High Point University, High Point, NC, USA 27268.ORCID 0000-0001-6914-8271

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The common view of art and science as polar opposites along the educational spectrum can sometimes mask the degree to which they inform one another. In fact, art can also serve as a way to foster interest in querying the natural world, ultimately allowing us to recruit highly creative individuals to join the scientific community. We have experienced firsthand how cellular processes, such as autophagy, which are not usually highlighted or described in detail in foundational cell biology textbooks, have served as an on-ramp for artists at the undergraduate and high school levels in the context of scientific research and science outreach, respectively. We discuss our experiences in this article and highlight the ways in which art's many dimensions are well-suited, not only for forging connections between scientists and their communities but also for encouraging creativity in the way scientists engage with visually and conceptually complex phenomena, such as autophagy.

Indexed as

AutophagyScienceAdaptor Protein Complex 3AutophagosomesCreativityHumansLipidsAdaptor Protein Complex 3LipidsScience outreachscience pedagogyscientific illustrationsteamundergraduate education

Identifiers

PMID32543335
PMCPMC8078646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.