Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32543120›Full record

Trial reportClinical pharmacology in drug development2021

A Randomized, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 3-Way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Effect of Therapeutic and Supratherapeutic Doses of Edaravone on QT/QTc Interval in Healthy Subjects.

Hidetoshi Shimizu, Shinsuke Inoue, Mai Endo, Yoshinobu Nakamaru, Kaori Yoshida, Tomoko Natori, Masae Kakubari, Makoto Akimoto, Kazuoki Kondo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical pharmacology in drug development, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04029090 (A Randomized, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Three-Way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Effect of MCI-186 at Therapeutic and Supra-Therapeutic Doses on the QT/QTc Interval in Healthy Subjects), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04029090 phase1completednot on this map

A Randomized, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Three-Way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Effect of MCI-186 at Therapeutic and Supra-Therapeutic Doses on the QT/QTc Interval in Healthy Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorShionogiRan2018 to 2018Enrolled27ConditionsHealthy Adult SubjectsArmsMCI-186, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hidetoshi ShimizuMitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinsuke InoueMitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Mai EndoMitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshinobu NakamaruMitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Kaori YoshidaMitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomoko NatoriMitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Masae KakubariMitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Makoto AkimotoMitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuoki KondoMitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma CorporationMitsubishi Group (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This randomized, single-blind, 3-way crossover study assessed the effect of edaravone on QT interval, including an exposure-response analysis. Twenty-seven healthy Japanese male volunteers, aged 20 to 49 years, were randomly assigned to receive a single intravenous dose of each treatment in 1 of 3 sequences (n = 9 each): ACB, BAC, and CBA, where A was edaravone 60 mg (therapeutic dose), B was edaravone 300 mg (supratherapeutic dose), and C was normal saline (placebo). Electrocardiographs were collected to assess treatment effects. In an exposure-response analysis, a linear model was determined to be valid and indicated no statistically significant positive slope for the relationship between change from baseline in QTcF (ΔQTcF) and edaravone concentration (0.000155 ms/(ng/mL); P = .1478); upper bounds of 2-sided 90% confidence intervals after placebo adjustment (ΔΔQTcF) were <10 milliseconds at the geometric mean maximum concentration for each edaravone dose. Overall estimated values by time point of ΔΔQTcF ≤0.9 milliseconds, no outlier values, and no morphologic changes suggestive of repolarization abnormalities were observed. Analysis of heart rate, PR interval, and QRS duration also revealed no adverse findings. These data indicate that edaravone, even at supratherapeutic doses, does not produce clinically meaningful QT prolongation and has no clinically relevant cardiac effects.

Indexed as

AdultCross-Over StudiesEdaravoneElectrocardiographyFree Radical ScavengersHealthy VolunteersHeart RateHumansLong QT SyndromeMaleMiddle AgedNeuroprotective AgentsSingle-Blind MethodYoung AdultEdaravoneFree Radical ScavengersNeuroprotective Agentscardiovascular safetyconcentration-QTc modeledaravoneICH E14QTc interval

Identifiers

PMID32543120
PMCPMC7818234
OpenAlexW3034439772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.