ArticleMolecular systems biology2020
(Photo)convert to pooled visual screening.
Article in Molecular systems biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- (Photo)convert to pooled visual screening.Molecular systems biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pooled genetic screening is a powerful method to systematically link genotype to phenotype and gain insights into biological processes, but applying it to visual phenotypes such as cell morphology or protein localization has remained a challenge. In their recent work, Fowler and colleagues (Hasle et al, 2020) describe an elegant approach for high-throughput cell sorting according to visual phenotypes based on selective photoconversion. This allows combining the advantages of high-content phenotyping by fluorescence microscopy with the efficiency of pooled screening to dissect complex phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.