ArticleCancer medicine2020
A nomogram for prediction of stage III/IV gastric cancer outcome after surgery: A multicenter population-based study.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative Lactate Dehydrogenase-to-Albumin Ratio and Overall Survival in Gastric Cancer: Stage-Specific Prognostic Implications.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
- Tumor index predicts recurrences of patients with pathological stage Ⅰ gastric cancer after radical surgical resection.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram to predict cancer-specific survival of elderly patients with unresected gastric cancer who received chemotherapy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Poor oral health was associated with higher risk of gastric cancer: Evidence from 1431677 participants.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Who are optimal candidates for primary tumor resection in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma? A population-based study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Construction of a nomogram with IrAE and clinic character to predict the survival of advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma patients undergoing anti-PD-1 treatment.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- A novel prognostic model to predict OS and DFS of stage II/III gastric adenocarcinoma patients in China.Heliyon · 2022Article
- Development and validation of novel nomograms to predict survival of patients with tongue squamous cell carcinoma.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Development of web-based dynamic nomogram to predict survival in patients with gastric cancer: a population-based study.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The nomogram for the prediction of overall survival in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma undergoing primary site surgery: A retrospective population-based study.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- A clinical model to predict distant metastasis in patients with superficial gastric cancer with negative lymph node metastasis and a survival analysis for patients with metastasis.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
- Effect of Time (Season, Surgical Starting Time, Waiting Time) on Patients with Gastric Cancer.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2021Article
- The incidence, risk factors and predictive nomograms for early death among patients with stage IV gastric cancer: a population-based study.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2020Article
- A nomogram for prediction of stage III/IV gastric cancer outcome after surgery: A multicenter population-based study.Cancer medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most patients with gastric cancer (GC) are first diagnosed at stage III-IV and surgery resection remains the primary therapeutic modality for these patients. However, clinical staging used for prediction of those patients provides limited information. We collected clinicopathological data and disease-progression information from 508 patients with stage III-IV GC at three Chinese hospitals and 1298 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Based on the stepwise multivariate regression model, we constructed a novel nomogram to predict overall survival (OS). The performance of discrimination for this model was measured using Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and receiver-operating characteristic curve (ROC), and was validated using calibration plots. Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that tumor size, age at diagnosis, N stage, tumor grade, and distant metastases were outstanding independent prognostic factors of stage III-IV GC. We developed a nomogram based on these five prognostic predictors. In the training set, the C-index of the nomogram was 0.645 (95% CI: 0.611-0.679), which was higher than that of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM system alone (sixth TNM: 0.544; seventh TNM: 0.575; eighth TNM: 0.568). Similar results were observed in validation cohort. Moreover, calibration blots demonstrated good consistency between the actual and predicted OS probabilities. According to the nomogram, GC individuals could be classified into three groups (low-, middle-, and high-risk) (P < .001). Our nomogram complements the current staging system for prediction of individual prognosis with stage III-IV GC, and may be helpful for making individualized treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.