Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32542896›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2020

Preliminary data on help-seeking intentions and behaviors of individuals completing a widely available online screen for eating disorders in the United States.

Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft, Katherine N Balantekin, Andrea K Graham, Bianca DePietro, Olivia Laing, Marie-Laure Firebaugh, Lauren Smolar, Dan Park, Claire Mysko, Burkhardt Funk and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Leveraging Technology to Enhance Eating Disorder Treatment Outcomes.The Psychiatric clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. "I Wanted to See How Bad it Was": Online Self-screening as a Critical Transition Point Among Young Adults with Common Mental Health Conditions.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ellen E Fitzsimmons-CraftDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7064-3835
Katherine N BalantekinDepartment of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6760-2714
Andrea K GrahamDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9736-8906
Bianca DePietroDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Olivia LaingDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Marie-Laure FirebaughDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Lauren SmolarNational Eating Disorders Association, New York, New York, USA.
Dan ParkNational Eating Disorders Association, New York, New York, USA.
Claire MyskoNational Eating Disorders Association, New York, New York, USA.
Burkhardt FunkInstitute of Information Systems, Leuphana University, Lüneburg, Germany.
C Barr TaylorDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4564-6548
Denise E WilfleyDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Funding

Washington University Nutrition Obesity Research CenterP30DK056341 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Brian N Finck · 1999 to 2026
$30.2M
WUSTL Transdisciplinary Pre- and Postdoctoral Training Program in Obesity and Cardiovascular DiseaseT32HL130357 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WILFLEY, DENISE ELLA · 2016 to 2025
$4.3M
Using Technology to Improve Eating Disorders TreatmentR01MH100455 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TAYLOR, CRAIG BARR, WILFLEY, DENISE ELLA · 2013 to 2017
$3.4M
Developing an Optimized Conversational Agent or "Chatbot" to Facilitate Mental Health Services Use in Individuals with Eating DisordersK08MH120341 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FITZSIMMONS-CRAFT, ELLEN E. · 2019 to 2023
$824k
Testing Intervention Strategies for Addressing Obesity and Binge EatingK01DK116925 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GRAHAM, ANDREA KASS · 2018 to 2022
$799k
The Intersection between Loss of Control Eating and Obesity: The Role of Restriction and Food Reinforcement.K01DK120778 · NIDDK · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI BALANTEKIN, KATHERINE NAIME · 2020 to 2024
$785k
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL130357NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK116925NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK120778NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056341NIMH NIH HHS K08 MH120341NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveScaling an online screen that provides referrals may be key in closing the treatment gap for eating disorders (EDs), but we need to understand respondents' help-seeking intentions and behaviors after receiving screen results. This study reported on these constructs among respondents to the National Eating Disorders Association online screen who screened positive or at high risk for an ED.

methodRespondents completed the screen over 18 months (February 9, 2018-August 28, 2019). Those screening positive or at high risk for an ED (n = 343,072) had the option to provide data on help-seeking intentions (after screen completion) and behaviors (2-month follow-up).

resultsOf eligible respondents, 4.8% (n = 16,396) provided data on help-seeking intentions, with only 33.7% of those reporting they would seek help. Only 7.6% of eligible respondents opted in to the 2-month follow-up, with 10.6% of those completing it (n = 2,765). Overall, 8.9% of respondents to the follow-up reported being in treatment when they took the screen, 15.5% subsequently initiated treatment, and 75.5% did not initiate/were not already in treatment. DISCUSSION: Preliminary results suggest that among the small minority who provided data, only one-third expressed help-seeking intentions and 16% initiated treatment. Online screening should consider ways to increase respondents' motivation for and follow-through with care.

Indexed as

Feeding and Eating DisordersFemaleHelp-Seeking BehaviorHumansIntentionInternetMaleMass ScreeningSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Stateseating disordershealth care utilizationhelp-seekingreferralscreening

Identifiers

PMID32542896
PMCPMC7978480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.