Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32542852›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2020

Decoding attention control and selection in visual spatial attention.

Xiangfei Hong, Ke Bo, Sreenivasan Meyyappan, Shanbao Tong, Mingzhou Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Hierarchical Organization of Human Visual Feature Attention Control.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiangfei HongShanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7475-3185
Ke BoJ Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Sreenivasan MeyyappanJ Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Shanbao TongSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Mingzhou DingJ Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

Funding

Mechanisms of attentional control: Structure and dynamics from simultaneous EEG-fMRI and machine learningR01MH117991 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI DING, MINGZHOU, MANGUN, GEORGE R · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
National Natural Science Foundation of China 61571295National Natural Science Foundation of China 61601294Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai 18ZR1432700NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117991Science and Technology Commission of the Shanghai Municipality 13dz2260500Shanghai Jiao Tong University K. C. Wong Medical Fellowship FundShanghai Mental Health Center 2020-FX-05Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau 20174Y0020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) are used extensively to investigate the neural mechanisms of attention control and selection. The univariate ERP approach, however, has left important questions inadequately answered. We addressed two questions by applying multivariate pattern classification to multichannel ERPs in two cued visual spatial attention experiments (N = 56): (a) impact of cueing strategies (instructional vs. probabilistic) on attention control and selection and (b) neural and behavioral effects of individual differences. Following cue onset, the decoding accuracy (cue left vs. cue right) began to rise above chance level earlier and remained higher in instructional cueing (~80 ms) than in probabilistic cueing (~160 ms), suggesting that unilateral attention focus leads to earlier and more distinct formation of the attention control set. A similar temporal sequence was also found for target-related processing (cued target vs. uncued target), suggesting earlier and stronger attention selection under instructional cueing. Across the two experiments: (a) individuals with higher cue-related decoding accuracy showed higher magnitude of attentional modulation of target-evoked N1 amplitude, suggesting that better formation of anticipatory attentional state leads to stronger modulation of target processing, and (b) individuals with higher target-related decoding accuracy showed faster reaction times (or larger cueing effects), suggesting that stronger selection of task-relevant information leads to better behavioral performance. Taken together, multichannel ERPs combined with machine learning decoding yields new insights into attention control and selection that complement the univariate ERP approach, and along with the univariate ERP approach, provides a more comprehensive methodology to the study of visual spatial attention.

Indexed as

Support Vector MachineAdolescentAdultAttentionBrain WavesCuesElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsExecutive FunctionFemaleFunctional LateralityHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceSpace PerceptionVisual Perceptiondecodingevent-related potentialN1pattern classificationreaction timeselective attention

Identifiers

PMID32542852
PMCPMC7469865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.