ArticleHuman brain mapping2020
Decoding attention control and selection in visual spatial attention.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the effects of regularization and cross-validation parameters on the performance of SVM-based decoding of EEG data.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2026Article
- Neurophysiology of Sleep-Deprivation Part 1: Effects of Sleep-Deprivation on Event-Related Potentials (ERPs)-Systematic and Mechanistic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Evaluating the effects of regularization and cross-validation parameters on the performance of SVM-based decoding of EEG data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Hierarchical Organization of Human Visual Feature Attention Control.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Assessing the impact of artifact correction and artifact rejection on the performance of SVM- and LDA-based decoding of EEG signals.NeuroImage · 2025Article
- Decoding Visual Spatial Attention Control.eNeuro · 2025Article
- Assessing the impact of artifact correction and artifact rejection on the performance of SVM-based decoding of EEG signals.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The strength of confidence is involved in controlling the intensity of attentional allocation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A lateralized alpha-band marker of the interference of exogenous attention over endogenous attention.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Proactive and reactive language control in bilingual language production revealed by decoding sustained potentials and electroencephalography oscillations.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Spatiotemporal characteristics of cortical activities of REM sleep behavior disorder revealed by explainable machine learning using 3D convolutional neural network.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Prioritizing flexible working memory representations through retrospective attentional strengthening.NeuroImage · 2023Article
- Information-based multivariate decoding reveals imprecise neural encoding in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder during visual selective attention.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Early different cognitive processes evoked by carnival vs. general promotions when shopping online: An ERPs study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Decoding attention control and selection in visual spatial attention.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Event-related potentials (ERPs) are used extensively to investigate the neural mechanisms of attention control and selection. The univariate ERP approach, however, has left important questions inadequately answered. We addressed two questions by applying multivariate pattern classification to multichannel ERPs in two cued visual spatial attention experiments (N = 56): (a) impact of cueing strategies (instructional vs. probabilistic) on attention control and selection and (b) neural and behavioral effects of individual differences. Following cue onset, the decoding accuracy (cue left vs. cue right) began to rise above chance level earlier and remained higher in instructional cueing (~80 ms) than in probabilistic cueing (~160 ms), suggesting that unilateral attention focus leads to earlier and more distinct formation of the attention control set. A similar temporal sequence was also found for target-related processing (cued target vs. uncued target), suggesting earlier and stronger attention selection under instructional cueing. Across the two experiments: (a) individuals with higher cue-related decoding accuracy showed higher magnitude of attentional modulation of target-evoked N1 amplitude, suggesting that better formation of anticipatory attentional state leads to stronger modulation of target processing, and (b) individuals with higher target-related decoding accuracy showed faster reaction times (or larger cueing effects), suggesting that stronger selection of task-relevant information leads to better behavioral performance. Taken together, multichannel ERPs combined with machine learning decoding yields new insights into attention control and selection that complement the univariate ERP approach, and along with the univariate ERP approach, provides a more comprehensive methodology to the study of visual spatial attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.