Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32542596›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2020

Isolation and Culture of Corneal Stromal Stem Cells.

Richard M Nagymihaly, Morten C Moe, Goran Petrovski

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard M NagymihalyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Center for Eye Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Morten C MoeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Center for Eye Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Goran PetrovskiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Center for Eye Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. goran.petrovski@medisin.uio.no.
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing body of evidence authenticates the benefit of corneal stroma-derived stem cells (CSSCs) in tissue engineering and regeneration oriented research, and potentially in the development of clinically relevant cellular therapies. Postmortem corneal tissue obtained from otherwise discarded material after keratoplasties is oftentimes the source of the cells for ex vivo research. Relatively easy to isolate and cultivate as well as inexpensive to culture, CSSCs now represent a well-described cell type with attributes of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). These include differentiation- and immunosuppressive potential, as well as a favorable capacity to expand in vitro. Here, we in detail describe two straightforward methods to isolate and establish CSSC cultures ex vivo.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCorneaCorneal KeratocytesCorneal StromaCorneal TransplantationExtracellular MatrixHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsCell culturingCorneaCorneal fibroblastsCorneal stromaCorneal stromal stem cellsIsolationKeratocytesMesenchymal stem cells

Identifiers

PMID32542596
OpenAlexW3035458399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.