ArticleNeurology and therapy2020
The Humanistic and Economic Burden of Migraine in Europe: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Five Countries.
Article in Neurology and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Competing treatments for migraine: a headache for decision-makers.The journal of headache and pain · 2023Pooled it
- Relative efficacy of lasmiditan versus rimegepant and ubrogepant as acute treatments for migraine: network meta-analysis findings.The journal of headache and pain · 2022Pooled it
- Early and Sustained Shift in Headache Day Frequency Following Eptinezumab Treatment in Adults With Migraine for Whom 2-4 Previous Preventive Treatments Have Failed: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Randomized DELIVER Trial.European journal of neurology · 2025Trial
- The second interim analysis of Italian participants enrolled in the real-world, Pan-European, prospective, observational, Phase 4 PEARL study of fremanezumab effectiveness.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Trial
- Shift in diagnostic classification of migraine after initiation of preventive treatment with eptinezumab: post hoc analysis of the PROMISE studies.BMC neurology · 2022Trial
- Measuring dose-related efficacy of eptinezumab for migraine prevention: post hoc analysis of PROMISE-1 and PROMISE-2.The journal of headache and pain · 2022Trial
- Monthly migraine days, tablet utilization, and quality of life associated with Rimegepant - post hoc results from an open label safety study (BHV3000-201).The journal of headache and pain · 2022Trial
- Mapping Migraine-Specific Quality of Life to Health State Utilities in Patients Receiving Rimegepant.Advances in therapy · 2021Trial
- Interictal burden, not ictal burden, drives work productivity impairment in headache disorders: insights from a Japanese cross-sectional study.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Patient-Reported Outcomes During the Acute Treatment of Migraine with Zavegepant Nasal Spray: Results from a 52-Week, Open-Label Study.Pain and therapy · 2026Article
- Post Hoc Subgroup Analyses of the Efficacy and Safety of Zavegepant for the Acute Treatment of Migraine According to Baseline Triptan Experience.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Improvements in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Through 64 Weeks' Rimegepant Treatment for Migraine: Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial with Open-Label Extension.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Impaired glymphatic function contributes to high-frequency attacks in patients with episodic migraine.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Article
- The epidemiology and unmet need of migraine in five european countries: results from the national health and wellness survey.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Patient preferences for preventive migraine treatments among Canadian adults: A discrete choice experiment.Headache · 2025Article
- Measuring incremental burdens associated with increasing preventive-treatment failures among adults with migraine: a retrospective, cross-sectional study.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Article
- The unmet needs in management, the treatment gap and the burden of migraine in Greece: a Delphi consensus and focus group study from patients' perspective.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Unmet needs in the management of migraine in Greece from the perspective of medical experts: a Delphi consensus.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- A Retrospective Analysis of Disease Epidemiology, Comorbidity Burden, Treatment Patterns, and Healthcare Resource Utilization of Migraine in the United Arab Emirates.Pain and therapy · 2024Article
- Societal and economic burden of migraine in Spain: results from the 2020 National Health and Wellness Survey.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPrior studies have estimated the burden of migraine in patients suffering from ≥ 4 monthly headache days (MHDs), but the burden experienced by migraineurs suffering from one to three (1-3) MHDs is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the incremental burden of migraine in terms of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), impairments to work and daily activities, and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) in five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK (EU5]), by comparing migraineurs with ≥ 4 MHDs and migraineurs with 1-3 MHDs.
methodsThe sample for this retrospective cross-sectional study was collected from the 2017 National Health and Wellness Survey (N = 62,000). The Short-Form 12-Item Health Survey Instrument, version-2 physical and mental component summary (PCS and MCS) scores, Short-Form 6-dimensions (SF-6D), EuroQoL 5-dimensions (EQ-5D) and EuroQoL visual analog scale (VAS) scores, impairments to work productivity and daily activities (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment [WPAI] Questionnaire) scores, and HRU were compared between migraineur groups with ≥ 4 MHDs (4-7, intermediate-frequency episodic migraine; 8-14, high-frequency episodic migraine; ≥ 15 chronic migraine) and the migraineur subgroup with 1-3 MHDs (low-frequency episodic migraine) using generalized linear modeling after adjusting for covariates.
resultsData from a total of 62,000 survey respondents were examined, of whom 1323 and 1569 were considered to have 1-3 MHDs and ≥ 4 MHDs (4-7 MHDs [n = 783]; 8-14 MHDs [n = 429]; ≥ 15 MHDs [n = 357]), respectively. The adjusted HRQoL was significantly lower in the 4-7 MHDs (for MCS and SF-6D scores; p < 0.0001) and 8-14 MHDs subgroups (for MCS, SF-6D, EQ-5D, and EuroQoL VAS scores, p < 0.0001; for PCS scores, p = 0.0007) than in the 1-3 MHDs subgroup. Migraineurs with 4-7 and 8-14 MHDs reported higher activity impairment and more frequent visits to healthcare providers (all p < 0.0001) and neurologists (p = 0.0006 and p < 0.0001, respectively) compared to the 1-3 MHDs subgroup. Migraineurs with ≥ 15 MHDs had significantly lower HRQoL and increased WPAI scores and HRU than the 1-3 MHDs subgroup.
conclusionsThis study provides evidence supporting the incremental burden of migraine, characterized by poorer HRQoL and increased WPAI scores and greater HRU, among migraineurs experiencing ≥ 4 MHDs compared with migraineurs experiencing 1-3 MHDs in the EU5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.