Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32542512›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI physics2020

Evaluation of block-sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction of

Elin Lindström, Lars Lindsjö, Anders Sundin, Jens Sörensen, Mark Lubberink

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Characterization of open-source BSREM reconstruction forPhysical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. QuantitativeEJNMMI physics · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Reduction of [EJNMMI physics · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Moving the goalposts while scoring-the dilemma posed by new PET technologies.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  15. New PET technologies - embracing progress and pushing the limits.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elin LindströmRadiology & Nuclear Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden. elin.lindstrom@surgsci.uu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0384-8045
Lars LindsjöPET Centre, Uppsala University Hospital, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anders SundinRadiology & Nuclear Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jens SörensenRadiology & Nuclear Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
Mark LubberinkRadiology & Nuclear Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, SE-751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SEUppsala University Hospital · SE

Funding

GE Healthcare N/ASwedish government under the ALF agreement N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlock-sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) is a fully convergent iterative image reconstruction algorithm. We hypothesize that tracers with different distribution patterns will result in different optimal settings for the BSREM algorithm. The aim of this study was to evaluate the image quality with variations in the applied β-value and acquisition time for three positron emission tomography (PET) tracers. NEMA image quality phantom measurements and clinical whole-body digital time-of-flight (TOF) PET/computed tomography (CT) examinations with

resultsThe highest β-value resulted in the lowest level of noise, which in turn resulted in the highest SNR and lowest SBR. Noise levels equal to or lower than those of OSEM were found with β-values equal to or higher than 400, 533, and 267 for

conclusionsWithin tracer-specific ranges of β-values, BSREM reconstruction resulted in increased SNR and SBR with respect to conventional OSEM reconstruction. Similar SNR, SBR, and noise levels could be attained with BSREM at relatively shorter acquisition times or, alternatively, lower administered dosages, compared to those attained with OSEM.

Indexed as

Block-sequential regularized expectation maximizationBSREMPenalization factorPET/CTRegularized image reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID32542512
PMCPMC7295929
OpenAlexW3035289889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.