Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32542469›Full record

ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2020

Oscillatory potentials in patients with birdshot chorioretinopathy.

Diane Wang, Archana Nair, Naomi Goldberg, Alan Friedman, Douglas Jabs, Scott E Brodie

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Birdshot retinochoroiditis in Brazil: a multicenter review of 40 patients.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Diane WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, NYU Langone Eye Center, NYU Langone Health, 222 East 41st St, New York, NY, USA.
Archana NairDepartment of Ophthalmology, NYU Langone Eye Center, NYU Langone Health, 222 East 41st St, New York, NY, USA.
Naomi GoldbergDepartment of Ophthalmology, Manhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Alan FriedmanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Douglas JabsDepartment of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Scott E BrodieDepartment of Ophthalmology, NYU Langone Eye Center, NYU Langone Health, 222 East 41st St, New York, NY, USA. Scott.brodie@nyumc.org.ORCID 0000-0002-3303-4552
NYU Langone Health · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USJohns Hopkins University · USManhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe electroretinogram (ERG) has proven to be useful in the evaluation and monitoring of patients with posterior uveitis. ERG oscillatory potentials (OPs) are sometimes reduced in many uveitic eyes with otherwise grossly normal ERG responses. This study compares ERG parameters, including OPs, between patients with birdshot chorioretinopathy, other posterior uveitis, and controls.

methodsThis was a retrospective case-control study. Sixty-four patients seen at a clinical practice had a total of 93 visits during which ERG was performed on both eyes. ERG data from 93 age-matched controls were also collected. Root-mean-squared (RMS) energy of the OPs was calculated using Fourier analysis for 88 patients and 88 age-matched controls for whom complete data were available. Photopic flicker amplitudes, photopic flicker latencies, scotopic b-wave amplitudes, and OP RMS values were compared between patients and controls. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

resultsThe mean ages of patients and controls were 55.9 ± 10.8 (SD) years and 55.1 ± 11.5, respectively. 83% of the patients had a diagnosis of BCR. The mean OP RMS value was significantly different in patients (15.6 µV ± 9.7 µV) versus control eyes (33.0 µV ± 12.7 µV), p < 0.001. Area under the ROC curves (AUROC) was 0.75 for photopic flicker amplitudes, 0.77 for photopic flicker latencies, 0.72 for scotopic b-wave amplitudes, and 0.88 for OP RMS. AUROC was significantly different between OP RMS and photopic flicker amplitudes (p < 0.001), between OP RMS and flicker latencies (p = 0.0032), and between OP RMS and scotopic b-wave amplitudes (p < 0.0001).

conclusionAnalysis of OPs shows greater sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis and evaluation of patients with birdshot chorioretinopathy than photopic and scotopic ERG amplitudes and photopic flicker latencies.

Indexed as

ElectroretinographyAdolescentAdultAgedBirdshot ChorioretinopathyCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOscillometryPhotic StimulationRetinaRetrospective StudiesROC CurveUveitis, PosteriorBirdshot chorioretinopathyERGFourier analysisOscillatory potentialsPosterior uveitis

Identifiers

PMID32542469
OpenAlexW3034699274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.