Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32542455›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2020

Machine Learning for 3D Kinematic Analysis of Movements in Neurorehabilitation.

Ahmet Arac

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. 3D Analysis of Human Movement, Sport, and Health Promotion.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Editorial: Machine Learning Approaches to Human Movement Analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ahmet AracDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 710 Westwood Plaza, Rm 3-232, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. aarac@mednet.ucla.edu.

Funding

Motor cortex network dynamics driving stroke recoveryK08NS109315 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARAC, AHMET · 2018 to 2022
$1.1M
NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS109315
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewRecent advances in the machine learning field, especially in deep learning, provide the opportunity for automated, detailed, and unbiased analysis of motor behavior. Although there has not yet been wide use of these techniques in the motor rehabilitation field, they have great potential. In this review, I describe how the current state of machine learning can be applied to 3D kinematic analysis, and how this will have an impact on neurorehabilitation. RECENT

findingsApplications of deep learning methods, in the form of convolutional neural networks, have been revolutionary for image analysis such as face recognition and object detection in images, exceeding human level performance. Recent studies have shown applicability of these deep learning approaches to human posture and movement classification. It is to be expected that portable stereo-camera systems will bring 3D pose estimation into the clinical setting and allow the assessment of movement quality in response to interventions. Advances in machine learning can help automate the process of obtaining 3D kinematics of human movements and to identify/classify patterns of movement.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeurological RehabilitationBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMovementNeural Networks, Computer3D kinematicsDeep learningHuman motor behaviorMachine learningMotor rehabilitationStroke recovery

Identifiers

PMID32542455
PMCPMC7397814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.