Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32542437›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology2021

Immune suppression in gliomas.

Matthew M Grabowski, Eric W Sankey, Katherine J Ryan, Pakawat Chongsathidkiet, Selena J Lorrey, Daniel S Wilkinson, Peter E Fecci

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 191 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
191citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

191 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 260 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

131 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew M GrabowskiDuke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Duke University Medical Center, 303 Research Drive, 220 Sands Bldg, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Eric W SankeyDuke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Duke University Medical Center, 303 Research Drive, 220 Sands Bldg, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Katherine J RyanDuke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Duke University Medical Center, 303 Research Drive, 220 Sands Bldg, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Pakawat ChongsathidkietDuke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Duke University Medical Center, 303 Research Drive, 220 Sands Bldg, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Selena J LorreyDuke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Duke University Medical Center, 303 Research Drive, 220 Sands Bldg, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Daniel S WilkinsonDuke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Duke University Medical Center, 303 Research Drive, 220 Sands Bldg, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Peter E FecciDuke Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program, Duke University Medical Center, 303 Research Drive, 220 Sands Bldg, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. peter.fecci@duke.edu.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University Hospital · USDuke University · US

Funding

Basic Immunology Training ProgramT32AI052077 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KRANGEL, MICHAEL S · 2002 to 2024
$4.2M
Clinical Brain Tumor Development of a Cytomegalovirus-targeted Therapeutic with Vaccine pre-conditioning to Validate Novel Predictors of Vaccine EfficacyR01CA235612 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SAMPSON, JOHN H. · 2019 to 2022
$2.0M
A Novel Clinical Challenge in Brain Tumor Immunology: T cell SequestrationR01NS099096 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FECCI, PETER · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NINDS Research Education Programs for Residents and Fellows in NeurosurgeryR25NS065731 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FECCI, PETER, HASAN, DAVID M. · 2009 to 2023
$968k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA235612NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI052077NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS099096NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS065731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe overall survival in patients with gliomas has not significantly increased in the modern era, despite advances such as immunotherapy. This is in part due to their notorious ability to suppress local and systemic immune responses, severely restricting treatment efficacy.

methodsWe have reviewed the preclinical and clinical evidence for immunosuppression seen throughout the disease process in gliomas. This review aims to discuss the various ways that brain tumors, and gliomas in particular, co-opt the body's immune system to evade detection and ensure tumor survival and proliferation.

resultsA multitude of mechanisms are discussed by which neoplastic cells evade detection and destruction by the immune system. These include tumor-induced T-cell and NK cell dysfunction, regulatory T-cell and myeloid-derived suppressor cell expansion, M2 phenotypic transformation in glioma-associated macrophages/microglia, upregulation of immunosuppressive glioma cell surface factors and cytokines, tumor microenvironment hypoxia, and iatrogenic sequelae of immunosuppressive treatments.

conclusionsGliomas create a profoundly immunosuppressive environment, both locally within the tumor and systemically. Future research should aim to address these immunosuppressive mechanisms in the effort to generate treatment options with meaningful survival benefits for this patient population.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaHumansImmunosuppression TherapyMacrophagesTumor MicroenvironmentGbmGlioblastomaGliomaImmune suppressionImmunosuppressionImmunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID32542437
PMCPMC7843555
OpenAlexW3035540747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.