SynthesisNeurosurgical review2021
Adverse intraoperative events during surgical repair of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Surgical Scene Recognition: A Comparative Study Among Health Care Professionals.Annals of surgery · 2026Article
- Pitfalls in Intracranial Aneurysm Clipping: How to Avoid and How to Get out of Them.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Anaesthesia for clipping of intracranial aneurysms.BJA education · 2025Review
- Article
- Decompressive craniectomy following subarachnoid hemorrhage: A prospective Swedish multicenter study.Brain & spine · 2025Article
- Partial coil embolization before surgical clipping of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Article
- Clinical Characteristics and Outcome of Patients With Intraoperative Aneurysm Rupture: A Retrospective Cohort Study From Nepal.Neurosurgery practice · 2024Article
- Article
- Clinical management of a ruptured intracranial aneurysm.Frontiers in stroke · 2024Review
- Shifted-windows transformers for the detection of cerebral aneurysms in microsurgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023Article
- A synthetic model simulator for intracranial aneurysm clipping: validation of the UpSurgeOn AneurysmBox.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- Plasma Amino Acids May Improve Prediction Accuracy of Cerebral Vasospasm after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Microsurgery for intracranial aneurysms: A qualitative survey on technical challenges and technological solutions.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compared with endovascular techniques, clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms has been shown to associate with increased morbidity in several studies. Despite this, clipping remains the preferred option for many aneurysms. The objective of this study is to describe the reported adverse events of open repair of ruptured cerebral aneurysms and their impact on patient outcome. The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched between June 1999 and June 2019 to identify original studies of at least 100 patients undergoing surgical repair of ruptured cerebral aneurysms and in which adverse event rates were reported. Thirty-six studies reporting adverse events in a total of 12,410 operations for repair of ruptured cerebral aneurysms were included. Surgical adverse events were common with 36 event types reported including intraoperative rupture (median rate of 16.6%), arterial injury (median rate of 3.8%) and brain swelling (median rate 5.6%). Only 6 surgical events were statistically shown to associate with poor outcomes by any author and for intraoperative rupture (the most frequently analysed), there was an even split between authors finding a statistical association with poor outcome and those finding no association. Even with modern surgical techniques, the technical demands of surgical aneurysm repair continue to lead to a high rate of intraoperative adverse events. Despite this, it is not known which of these intraoperative events are the most important contributors to the poor outcomes often seen in these patients. More research directed towards identifying the events that most drive operative morbidity has the potential to improve outcomes for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.