Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32542304›Full record

ArticleGenetics and molecular biology2020

The molecular cytogenetic characterization of Conopophaga lineata indicates a common chromosome rearrangement in the Parvorder Furnariida (Aves, Passeriformes).

Thays Duarte de Oliveira, Rafael Kretschmer, Natasha Ávila Bertocchi, Patricia C M O'Brien, Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith, Analía Del Valle Garnero, Edivaldo Herculano Correa de Oliveira, Ricardo José Gunski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics and molecular biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A cytogenetic analysis with chromosome painting in typical antbirds (Passeriformes, Thamnophilidae) and an inference on chromosome evolution in Passeriformes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Thays Duarte de OliveiraUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4131-8210
Rafael KretschmerUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6856-2152
Natasha Ávila BertocchiUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8880-5967
Patricia C M O'BrienUniversity of Cambridge, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Malcolm A Ferguson-SmithUniversity of Cambridge, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Analía Del Valle GarneroUniversidade Federal do Pampa (UNIPAMPA), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas, São Gabriel, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4252-8228
Edivaldo Herculano Correa de OliveiraInstituto Evandro Chagas, Seção Meio Ambiente (SAMAM), Ananindeua, PA, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6315-3352
Ricardo José GunskiUniversidade Federal do Pampa (UNIPAMPA), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas, São Gabriel, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7315-0590
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversidade Federal do Pampa · BRUniversity of Cambridge · GBInstituto Evandro Chagas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytogenetic analyses of the Suboscines species are still scarce, and so far, there is no karyotype description of any species belonging to the family Conopophagidae. Thus, the aim of this study is to describe and analyze the karyotype of Conopophaga lineata by chromosome painting using Gallus gallus (GGA) probes and to identify the location of the 18/28S rDNA cluster. Metaphases were obtained from fibroblast culture from two individuals of C. lineata. We observed a diploid number of 2n=78. GGA probes showed that most ancestral syntenies are conserved, except for the fission of GGA1 and GGA2, into two distinct pairs each. We identified the location of 18S rDNA genes in a pair of microchromosomes. The fission of the syntenic group corresponding to GGA2 was observed in other Furnariida, and hence may correspond to a chromosomal synapomorphy for the species of Parvorder Furnariida.

Identifiers

PMID32542304
PMCPMC7295152
OpenAlexW3035588614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.