ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2020
Feasibility and Utility of an Eye-Tracking Device for Assessing Teachers of Invasive Bedside Procedures.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Eye-tracking during simulation-based echocardiography: a feasibility study.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Article
- Positional Change of the Eyeball During Eye Movements: Evidence of Translatory Movement.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient-related complications from invasive bedside procedures (IBPs) are attributed to the experience and proficiency of the operator. Furthermore, IBP complications by trainees may be due to practice variability and competency among IBP teachers. The use of gaze metrics technology to better understand the behaviors of IBP teachers may aid in the creation of faculty development checklists and, ultimately, reduce procedural complications. Prior research on gaze patterns has focused on the individual performing the procedure, but the goal of this pilot study was to assess gaze behaviors of supervising teachers of IBPs, which is a paradigm shift within procedural education. In this study, pulmonary and critical care medicine fellows placed a central venous catheter on a simulated task trainer as pulmonary and critical care medicine faculty supervised while wearing an eye-tracking device. Both quantitative and qualitative data were obtained. Gaze analysis was divided into 2 areas of interest (ultrasonography and procedure site) and 3 procedural tasks (venous puncture, dilation, and flushing the line). Study findings included the following: (1) calibration was easy and took seconds to complete, (2) the device is relatively comfortable and did not interfere with tasks, (3) a trend toward a higher fixation frequency and dwell time on the ultrasound images during the puncture segment, and (4) variations in fixation frequency on the ultrasound images among supervising IBP teachers. This study documents the feasibility of the eye-tracking device for assessing behaviors of supervisory IBP teachers. There may be a signal suggesting differences in gaze patterns among supervisory teachers, which warrants further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.