ArticleMayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes2020
Pregnancy Reasonably Excluded Guide (PREG) Evaluation of Pregnancy Status Before Contraceptive Procedures: Improved Availability of Same-Day Insertion.
Article in Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Same-day long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) placement: a systematic review of the benefits and barriers in the United States.BMC women's health · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine whether implementation of the Pregnancy Reasonably Excluded Guide (PREG) in a primary care gynecology clinic improves access to contraceptive procedures and affects the number of urine human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) tests. PATIENTS AND
methodsPREG was administered to 981 women aged 18 to 50 years (1012 visits) who were seen in a primary care gynecology clinic for contraceptive procedures from September 30, 2015, through April 30, 2018. Contraceptive procedures included insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive (IUC) or subdermal contraceptive implant. After PREG review and patient discussion, health care professional decided to perform the procedure with or without hCG measurement or to reschedule if the patient's pregnancy status was uncertain. We collected data on the rate of same-day contraceptive procedures and the rate of hCG testing. Data from the PREG implementation period were compared with historical data from 185 women undergoing contraceptive procedures before PREG implementation.
resultsMeasurement of hCG was performed in 53% of women before and 24.1% (224 of 1,012 visits) after PREG implementation in the primary care setting. After PREG implementation, 974 0f 1012 patients (96.2%) were eligible for a same-day contraceptive procedure. If traditional criteria, current menses, or a preexisting IUC or implant in place were required for IUC or implant insertion, only 594 patients (58.7%) would have qualified for a same-day procedure. No contraceptive procedures occurred in pregnant women.
conclusionPREG implementation allowed for same-day IUC or implant insertion in 974 women (96.2%) seen for a contraceptive procedure. Most of the women (75.9%) did not require preprocedure hCG measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.