ArticleFrontiers in physics2020
Thermodynamic Integration in 3n Dimensions without Biases or Alchemy for Protein Interactions.
Article in Frontiers in physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thermodynamic Integration in 3n Dimensions without Biases or Alchemy for Protein Interactions.Frontiers in physics · 2020Article
- Atomistic Analysis of ToxN and ToxI Complex Unbinding Mechanism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Thermodynamic integration (TI), a powerful formalism for computing Gibbs free energy, has been implemented for many biophysical processes with alchemical schemes that require delicate human efforts to choose/design biasing potentials for sampling the desired biophysical events and to remove their artifactitious consequences afterwards. Theoretically, an alchemical scheme is exact but practically, an unsophisticated implementation of this exact formula can cause error amplifications. Small relative errors in the input parameters can be amplified many times in their propagation into the computed free energy [due to subtraction of similar numbers such as (105 ± 5)‒(100 ± 5) = 5 ± 7]. In this paper, we present an unsophisticated implementation of TI in 3n dimensions (3nD) (n=1,2,3…) for the potential of mean force along a 3nD path connecting one state in the bound state ensemble to one state in the unbound state ensemble. Fluctuations in these 3nD are integrated in the bound and unbound state ensembles but not along the 3nD path. Using TI3nD, we computed the standard binding free energies of three protein complexes: trometamol in Salmonella effector SpvD (n=1), biotin-avidin (n=2), and Colicin E9 endonuclease with cognate immunity protein Im9 (n=3). We employed three different protocols in three independent computations of E9-Im9 to show TI3nD's robustness. We also computed the hydration energies of ten biologically relevant compounds (n=1 for water, acetamide, urea, glycerol, trometamol, ammonium and n=2 for erythritol, 1,3-propanediol, xylitol, biotin). Each of the 15 computations is accomplishable within one (for hydration) to ten (for E9-Im9) days on an inexpensive GPU workstation. The computed results all agree with the available experimental data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.