ArticleCureus2020
Microbial Resistance in Urinary Tract Infections.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can Pakistan achieve the UNGA 70% antibiotic access target? A scoping review of susceptibility data.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Identification of SNPs inFrontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- A Cross-Sectional Study to Evaluate Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Uropathogens from South Punjab, Pakistan.Infection and drug resistance · 2022Article
- Uropathogens Antimicrobial Sensitivity and Resistance Pattern From Outpatients in Balochistan, Pakistan.Cureus · 2021Article
- Antibiotic Resistance among Patients with Urinary Tract Infections in Kandahar, Afghanistan.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social MedicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective To determine the pattern of microbes responsible for urinary tract infections and their susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. Methods This was a prospective, observational study conducted at Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. The urine samples of 440 patients were collected and sent for culture and sensitivity analysis. The results were recorded on a proforma. The data were analyzed using IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Descriptive statistics were used to describe the data. Chi-square test was applied to determine the significance of the difference between gender and microorganisms as well as microorganism and antimicrobial sensitivity. P-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Results Out of 440 urine samples, 144 culture-positive samples had been obtained from male participants and 296 culture-positive samples had been obtained from female participants. The most common organism on analysis was Escherichia coli. There were more rates of resistance in males. The organisms were most susceptible to fosfomycin and imipenem (p = 0.01). The organisms were resistant to ceftazidime (p = 0.01). Conclusion In Pakistan, most patients with resistance present with mild symptoms instead of severe clinical manifestations. Therefore, there is a need to reduce the over-prescription of antibiotics for urinary tract infections, especially in cases when other non-antimicrobial agents can be used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.