Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32542028›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Confronting challenges to opioid risk mitigation in the U.S. health system: Recommendations from a panel of national experts.

Erin P Finley, Suyen Schneegans, Megan E Curtis, Vikhyat S Bebarta, Joseph K Maddry, Lauren Penney, Don McGeary, Jennifer Sharpe Potter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Potentially Inappropriate Drug Duplication in a Cohort of Older Adults with Dementia.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Erin P FinleyUT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4497-7721
Suyen SchneegansUT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America.
Megan E CurtisUT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America.
Vikhyat S BebartaUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
Joseph K MaddryEmergency Department, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America.
Lauren PenneyUT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8285-7352
Don McGearyUT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America.
Jennifer Sharpe PotterUT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States of America.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USBrooke Army Medical Center · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmid the ongoing U.S. opioid crisis, achieving safe and effective chronic pain management while reducing opioid-related morbidity and mortality is likely to require multi-level efforts across health systems, including the Military Health System (MHS), Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), and civilian sectors.

objectiveWe conducted a series of qualitative panel discussions with national experts to identify core challenges and elicit recommendations toward improving the safety of opioid prescribing in the U.S.

designWe invited national experts to participate in qualitative panel discussions regarding challenges in opioid risk mitigation and how best to support providers in delivery of safe and effective opioid prescribing across MHS, VA, and civilian health systems.

participantsEighteen experts representing primary care, emergency medicine, psychology, pharmacy, and public health/policy participated. APPROACH: Six qualitative panel discussions were conducted via teleconference with experts. Transcripts were coded using team-based qualitative content analysis to identify key challenges and recommendations in opioid risk mitigation. KEY

resultsPanelists provided insight into challenges across multiple levels of the U.S. health system, including the technical complexity of treating chronic pain, the fraught national climate around opioids, the need to integrate surveillance data across a fragmented U.S. health system, a lack of access to non-pharmacological options for chronic pain care, and difficulties in provider and patient communication. Participating experts identified recommendations for multi-level change efforts spanning policy, research, education, and the organization of healthcare delivery.

conclusionsReducing opioid risk while ensuring safe and effective pain management, according to participating experts, is likely to require multi-level efforts spanning military, veteran, and civilian health systems. Efforts to implement risk mitigation strategies at the patient level should be accompanied by efforts to increase education for patients and providers, increase access to non-pharmacological pain care, and support use of existing clinical decision support, including state-level prescription drug monitoring programs.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidChronic PainDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansIntersectoral CollaborationMaleMilitary Health ServicesOpioid EpidemicPain ManagementPatient Education as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prescription Drug MisusePrescription Drug Monitoring ProgramsPrimary Health CareAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID32542028
PMCPMC7295233
OpenAlexW3035571502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.