Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32541907›Full record

ReviewLab animal2020

Zebrafish microbiome studies make waves.

Keaton Stagaman, Thomas J Sharpton, Karen Guillemin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lab animal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Environmental science & technology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. AmicroLife · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Long Term Culture of Germ-Free Zebrafish Using Gamma-Irradiated Feeds.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Zebrafish ApoB-Containing Lipoprotein Metabolism: A Closer Look.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Keaton StagamanDepartment of Microbiology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2815-4530
Thomas J SharptonDepartment of Microbiology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Karen GuilleminInstitute of Molecular Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA. kguillem@uoregon.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6004-9955

Funding

MODE OF ACTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICANTST32ES007060 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Jamie DeWitt, Siva Kumar Kolluri · 1985 to 2026
$11.6M
Live Imaging CoreP01GM125576 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI GUILLEMIN, KAREN J · 2018 to 2022
$7.8M
Impacts of Benzo[a]pyrene on Microbiome Development across Lifespan and Generations and the Behavioral ConsequencesR01ES030226 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SHARPTON, THOMAS JEFFERSON · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES030226NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007060NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM125576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zebrafish have a 50-year history as a model organism for studying vertebrate developmental biology and more recently have emerged as a powerful model system for studying vertebrate microbiome assembly, dynamics and function. In this Review, we discuss the strengths of the zebrafish model for both observational and manipulative microbiome studies, and we highlight some of the important insights gleaned from zebrafish gut microbiome research.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsModels, BiologicalZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID32541907
PMCPMC7755162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.