Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32541778›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Taxonomic diversity of sputum microbiome in lung cancer patients and its relationship with chromosomal aberrations in blood lymphocytes.

V G Druzhinin, L V Matskova, P S Demenkov, E D Baranova, V P Volobaev, V I Minina, S V Apalko, M A Churina, S A Romanyuk, S G Shcherbak and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Subtype-Based Microbial Analysis in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Saliva microbiome changes in thyroid cancer and thyroid nodules patients.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Oncoimmunology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Microbiota Biomarkers for Lung Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

V G DruzhininKemerovo State University, Kemerovo, Russian Federation.
L V MatskovaKemerovo State University, Kemerovo, Russian Federation. liudmila.matskova@ki.se.
P S DemenkovInstitute of Cytology and Genetics SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
E D BaranovaKemerovo State University, Kemerovo, Russian Federation.
V P VolobaevKemerovo State University, Kemerovo, Russian Federation.
V I MininaKemerovo State University, Kemerovo, Russian Federation.
S V ApalkoCity Hospital #40, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
M A ChurinaCity Hospital #40, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
S A RomanyukCity Hospital #40, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
S G ShcherbakCity Hospital #40, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
V I IvanovKemerovo State University, Kemerovo, Russian Federation.
A V LarionovKemerovo State University, Kemerovo, Russian Federation.
Kemerovo State University · RUCity Hospital No. 40 · RUInstitute of Cytology and Genetics · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we report a pilot-sized study to compare the taxonomic composition of sputum microbiome in 17 newly-diagnosed lung cancer (LC) patients and 17 controls. Another object was to compare the representation of individual bacterial genera and species in sputum with the frequency of chromosomal aberrations in the blood lymphocytes of LC patients and in controls. Both groups were male; average age 56.1 ± 11.5 in patients and 55.7 ± 4.1 in controls. Differences in the species composition of bacterial communities in LC patients and controls were significant (pseudo-F = 1.94; p = 0.005). Increased prevalence in LC patients was detected for the genera Haemophilus and Bergeyella; whereas a decrease was observed for the genera Atopobium, Stomatobaculum, Treponema and Porphyromonas. Donors with high frequencies of chromosomal aberrations had a significant reduction in the microbiome of representatives of the genus Atopobium in the microbiome and a simultaneous increase in representatives of the species Alloprevotella compared to donors with a low level of chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes. Thus, a comparison of the bacterial composition in the sputum of donors with cytogenetic damages in theirs lymphocytes, warrants further investigations on the potential role of microorganisms in the process of mutagenesis in somatic cells of the host body.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsAgedBacteriaCase-Control StudiesDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsLymphocytesMaleMicrobiotaMiddle AgedPhylogenyPilot ProjectsPrevalenceDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID32541778
PMCPMC7295751
OpenAlexW3034526770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.