Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32541640›Full record

ArticleAnnals of transplantation2020

Minimally Invasive Surgery Is Feasible in Patients with Liver and Kidney Transplantation.

Da Wen Hsu, Chun Ming Chang, Chun Shuo Hsu, Wen Yao Yin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of transplantation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Da Wen HsuDepartment of Surgery, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Chun Ming ChangSchool of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
Chun Shuo HsuSchool of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
Wen Yao YinDepartment of Surgery, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Tzu Chi University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has rapidly advanced, but its use in transplant patients has lagged. We share our experience of MIS for patients after kidney and liver transplantation and compare our results with similar studies in the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS This study included 14 MIS (12 laparoscopic, 2 transvaginal) procedures for 13 transplant cases (6 liver and 7 kidney) done from May 2006 to May 2018. Gastrointestinal surgery was performed in 6 cases: appendectomy performed 8 months after liver transplant and 16 months after kidney transplant in 2 cases, radical right hemi-colectomy performed 6 weeks after liver transplant in 1 case; exploration for chylous ascites 6 months after liver transplant in 1 case, sleeve gastrectomy performed 3 years after kidney transplant in 1 case, and partial hepatectomy performed 12 years after kidney transplant in 1 case. For urological problems, 2 patients received ipsilateral right-side nephroureterectomy performed 10 and 12 years after kidney transplant, and 1 patient received contralateral left-side nephroureterectomy performed 12 years after kidney transplant. The 2 liver transplant patients with huge incisional hernias received repair approximately 3 and 2 years after liver transplant. Three patients underwent gynecological surgery: 2 transvaginal for pelvic floor reconstruction in 1 patient with liver transplant and 1 hysterectomy in a kidney transplant patient, and 1 laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy in a kidney transplant patient. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical presentation, operative findings, operation time, postoperative complications, and length of stay. RESULTS The postoperative course was uneventful, with early resumption of oral intake, including immunosuppressants administered the same as in the non-transplant patients. All surgical procedures in these transplant patients were achieved without conversion, showed stable kidney and liver function, had better surgical outcomes in comparison with traditional surgery, and most of them were discharged within 1 week. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic and non-laparoscopic MIS surgery are feasible and safe for abdominal organ transplant patients and are helpful for timely intervention in cases with acute abdomen. No adjustment of immunosuppressant is usually needed, as oral intake can be resumed very soon after surgery.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansKidney TransplantationLength of StayLiver TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsTransplant RecipientsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32541640
PMCPMC7318835
OpenAlexW3034552872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.