Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32541528›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

Dose-response of rPMS for upper Limb hemiparesis after stroke.

Shoji Kinoshita, Kumi Ikeda, Shinji Yasuno, Sho Takahashi, Naoki Yamada, Yumi Okuyama, Nobuyuki Sasaki, Takuya Hada, Chiaki Kuriyama, Shin Suzuki and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shoji KinoshitaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine.
Kumi IkedaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine.
Shinji YasunoClinical Research Support Center, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Sho TakahashiClinical Research Support Center, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoki YamadaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine.
Yumi OkuyamaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine.
Nobuyuki SasakiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine.
Takuya HadaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine.
Chiaki KuriyamaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine.
Shin SuzukiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine.
Midori HamaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine.
Naoto OzakiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine.
Shu WatanabeDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine.
Masahiro AboDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine.
Suzuki (Japan) · JPPain and Rehabilitation Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRepetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) therapy is an innovative and minimally invasive neurorehabilitative technique and has been shown to facilitate neural plasticity. However, there is at present no research that clarifies the dose-response of rPMS therapy on the recovery of upper limb hemiparesis after stroke. This trial aims to clarify the dose-response of rPMS therapy combined with intensive occupational therapy (OT) for chronic stroke patients with moderate to severe upper limb hemiparesis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicenter, prospective, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled study with 3 parallel groups will be conducted from January 20, 2020 to September 30, 2022. Fifty patients will be randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:2:2 to the control group, the group receiving daily 2400 pulses of rPMS, or the group receiving daily 4800 pulses of rPMS, respectively. From the day after admission (Day 1), rPMS therapy and intensive OT will be initiated. The primary outcome is the change in the motor function of the affected upper extremity (Fugl-Meyer Assessment) between the time of admission (Day 0) and the day after 2 weeks of treatment (Day 14). Secondary outcomes will include the changes in spasticity, active range of motion, motor evoked potential, and activity of daily living. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Jikei University Certified Review Board for all institutions (reference number: JKI19-020). Results of the primary and secondary outcomes will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at international congresses. The results will also be disseminated to patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs032190191.

Indexed as

Occupational TherapyUpper ExtremityCombined Modality TherapyHumansMagnetic Field TherapyMulticenter Studies as TopicParesisProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodStrokeStroke Rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID32541528
PMCPMC7302622
OpenAlexW3034298450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.