ArticleMedicine2020
Efficacy of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab for cervical cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated Network Pharmacology and Metabolomics to Dissect the Mechanisms of Naringin for Treating Cervical Cancer.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCervical cancer (CC) is a very common and malignant tumor in female population. Although a variety of single medications are reported to treat this condition, they all have limited efficacy. Previous studies have reported the combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab (PCB) can be used for the treatment of patients with CC effectively. However, no systematic review has explored its efficacy and safety. This study will address its efficacy and safety systematically and comprehensively.
methodsThe following electronic databases will be retrieved from their inceptions to the January 1, 2020 to identify all potential associated studies: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, Google scholar, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. We will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adult women (≥18 years) with CC globally. Eligible interventions will target any forms of PCB. The study methodological quality of all included studies will be appraised using Cochrane risk of bias tool. Statistical analysis will be undertaken using RevMan 5.3 software. In addition, we will perform a narrative synthesis to describe quality and content of the evidence.
resultsThis study will summarize recent evidence and provide quality evidence for the efficacy and safety of PCB on CC.
conclusionThe findings of this study will seek to identify the efficacy and safety of PCB and suggest future directions for research efforts targeting CC among this population. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: INPLASY202040195.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.