Trial reportMedicine2020
Corticosteroids or immunosuppressants were not superior to supportive care in IgA nephropathy patients with mild proteinuria.
Trial report in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Efficacy and safety of finerenone in IgA nephropathy: an observational multicentre study.Clinical kidney journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe aimed to evaluate the effect of immunosuppressant therapy for immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) patients with mild proteinuria (<1 g/d).
methodsWe recruited patients with biopsy-proven IgAN from 4 study centers. Patients were followed for more than 1 year or up to the study end point. Clinical indexes, renal pathological data, and treatment information were collected during the follow-up period. IgAN patients with mild proteinuria (<1 g/d at biopsy) were included. Patients were divided into a supportive care group (SC) and an immunosuppressant group (IT). Patients in the SC group received the optimal dose of renin angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi). Patients in the IT group received corticosteroids or immunosuppressant therapy plus RASi. Responses to therapy included complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), no response (NR), and end stage renal disease (ESRD). A 50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and/or ESRD was the primary end point of this study.
results295 patients (36.3% male and 63.7% female) were included in this study and were followed for 49.46 ± 24.35 months. We found a significant difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate, urine protein, mesangial hypercellularity, segmental glomerulosclerosis, cellular or fibrocellular crescents, and glomerulosclerosis between the 2 treatment groups at baseline. At the final follow-up, 224 patients (75.9%) achieved CR, 7 patients (2.4%) achieved PR, 55 patients (18.6%) had NR, and 9 patients (3.1%) reached ESRD. However, no significant differences were observed between the SC and IT groups with respect to CR (76.4% vs 73.5%, P = .659), PR (2.0% vs 4.1%, P = .329), NR (18.3% vs 20.4%, P = .728), and ESRD (3.3% vs 2.0%, P = 1.000). Kidney survival rates were also comparable between the SC and IT groups (93.7% vs 94.1%, P = .808). We observed similar results after subgroup analysis according to chronic kidney disease stages or pathological manifestations. A multivariate model showed that segmental sclerosis (HR 9.55, 95% CI 1.04-88.16, P = .047) and glomerulosclerosis (HR 21.09, 95% CI 1.39-320.53, P = .028) were independent predictors of poor renal survival.
conclusionsCorticosteroids or immunosuppressants were not superior to supportive care in IgA nephropathy patients with mild proteinuria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.