Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32541304›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2020

Partner Notification Approaches for Sex Partners and Children of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Index Cases in Côte d'Ivoire.

Marie-Huguette K A Kingbo, Petros Isaakidis, Arielle Lasry, Kudakwashe C Takarinda, Marcel Manzi, John Pringle, Flore Adjoua Konan, Jules NʼDraman, Nathalie Krou Danho, Armand K Abokon and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Marie-Huguette K A KingboFrom the Fondation Ariel Glaser for the Fight Against Pediatric AIDS, Côte d'Ivoire.
Petros IsaakidisMédecins Sans Frontières, Operational Research, Luxembourg.
Arielle LasryCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Kudakwashe C TakarindaCenter for Operational Research, International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France.
Marcel ManziMédecins Sans Frontières, Operational Research, Luxembourg.
John PringleMcGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Flore Adjoua KonanFrom the Fondation Ariel Glaser for the Fight Against Pediatric AIDS, Côte d'Ivoire.
Jules NʼDramanFrom the Fondation Ariel Glaser for the Fight Against Pediatric AIDS, Côte d'Ivoire.
Nathalie Krou DanhoFrom the Fondation Ariel Glaser for the Fight Against Pediatric AIDS, Côte d'Ivoire.
Armand K AbokonFrom the Fondation Ariel Glaser for the Fight Against Pediatric AIDS, Côte d'Ivoire.
Nicole Isabelle L DoumateyCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Médecins Sans Frontières · LUCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USInternational Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · FRMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFour partner notification approaches were introduced in health facilities in Côte d'Ivoire to increase human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing uptake among the type of contacts (sex partners and biological children younger than 15 years). The study assessed the 4 approaches: client referral (index cases refer the contacts for HIV testing), provider referral (health care providers refer the contacts), contract referral (index case-provider hybrid approach), and dual referral (both the index and their partner are tested simultaneously).

methodsProgram data were collected at 4 facilities from October 2018 to March 2019 from index case files and HIV testing register. We compared uptake of the approaches, uptake of HIV testing, and HIV positivity percentages, stratified by contact type and gender.

resultsThere were 1089 sex partners and 469 children from 1089 newly diagnosed index cases. About 90% of children were contacted through client referral: 85.2% of those were tested and 1.4% was positive. Ninety percent of the children came from female index cases. The provider referral brought in 56.3% of sex partners, of whom 97.2% were HIV-tested. The client referral brought in 30% of sex partners, of whom only 81.5% were HIV-tested. The HIV positivity percentages were 75.5% and 72.7%, respectively, for the 2 approaches. Male index cases helped to reach twice as many HIV-positive sexual contacts outside the household (115) than female index cases (53). The contract and dual referrals were not preferred by index cases.

conclusionsProvider referral is a successful and acceptable strategy for bringing in sex partners for testing. Client referral is preferred for children.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSexual PartnersChildContact TracingCote d'IvoireFemaleHIVHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID32541304
PMCPMC7294752
OpenAlexW3028007648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.