Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32541049›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Wounding-induced changes in cellular pressure and localized auxin signalling spatially coordinate restorative divisions in roots.

Lukas Hoermayer, Juan Carlos Montesinos, Petra Marhava, Eva Benková, Saiko Yoshida, Jiří Friml

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lukas HoermayerInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Juan Carlos MontesinosInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9179-6099
Petra MarhavaInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5904-1657
Eva BenkováInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Saiko YoshidaInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6111-9353
Jiří FrimlInstitute of Science and Technology Austria, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria jiri.friml@ist.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0002-8302-7596

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 29988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wound healing in plant tissues, consisting of rigid cell wall-encapsulated cells, represents a considerable challenge and occurs through largely unknown mechanisms distinct from those in animals. Owing to their inability to migrate, plant cells rely on targeted cell division and expansion to regenerate wounds. Strict coordination of these wound-induced responses is essential to ensure efficient, spatially restricted wound healing. Single-cell tracking by live imaging allowed us to gain mechanistic insight into the wound perception and coordination of wound responses after laser-based wounding in

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCell DivisionGene Expression Regulation, PlantIndoleacetic AcidsKynurenineLasersPhthalimidesPlant CellsPlant RootsRegenerationSignal TransductionTriazoles5-(4-chlorophenyl)-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3-thiolalpha-naphthylphthalamic acidArabidopsis ProteinsIndoleacetic AcidsKynureninePhthalimidesTriazolesauxincell divisioncell expansionERF115regeneration

Identifiers

PMID32541049
PMCPMC7334516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.