Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32540843›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2020

Using Natural Language Processing and Sentiment Analysis to Augment Traditional User-Centered Design: Development and Usability Study.

Curtis Lee Petersen, Ryan Halter, David Kotz, Lorie Loeb, Summer Cook, Dawna Pidgeon, Brock C Christensen, John A Batsis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. BandPass: A Bluetooth-Enabled Remote Monitoring Device for Sarcopenia.IEEE International Conference on Communications workshops. IEEE International Conference on Communications · 2021
    Article
  18. Remote Rehabilitation: A Field-Based Feasibility Study of an mHealth Resistance Exercise Band....IEEE...International Conference on Connected Health: Applications, Systems and Engineering Technologies. IEEE International Conference on Connected Health: Applications, Systems and Engineering Technologies · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Curtis Lee PetersenThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy, Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7210-447X
Ryan HalterThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0222-3948
David KotzComputer Science, Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7411-2783
Lorie LoebComputer Science, Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4934-1864
Summer CookDepartment of Kinesiology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4339-716X
Dawna PidgeonDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6557-1830
Brock C ChristensenQuantitative Biomedical Sciences Program, Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3022-426X
John A BatsisThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy, Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0845-4416

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Fred W Kolling IV · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Treatment Development & Evaluation CoreP30DA029926 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Lisa A. Marsch · 2011 to 2026
$21.5M
Mobile Health Obesity Wellness Intervention in Rural Older Adults_Res1K23AG051681 · NIA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BATSIS, JOHN A. · 2016 to 2022
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NIA NIH HHS K23 AG051681NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA029926Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSarcopenia, defined as the age-associated loss of muscle mass and strength, can be effectively mitigated through resistance-based physical activity. With compliance at approximately 40% for home-based exercise prescriptions, implementing a remote sensing system would help patients and clinicians to better understand treatment progress and increase compliance. The inclusion of end users in the development of mobile apps for remote-sensing systems can ensure that they are both user friendly and facilitate compliance. With advancements in natural language processing (NLP), there is potential for these methods to be used with data collected through the user-centered design process.

objectiveThis study aims to develop a mobile app for a novel device through a user-centered design process with both older adults and clinicians while exploring whether data collected through this process can be used in NLP and sentiment analysis.

methodsThrough a user-centered design process, we conducted semistructured interviews during the development of a geriatric-friendly Bluetooth-connected resistance exercise band app. We interviewed patients and clinicians at weeks 0, 5, and 10 of the app development. Each semistructured interview consisted of heuristic evaluations, cognitive walkthroughs, and observations. We used the Bing sentiment library for a sentiment analysis of interview transcripts and then applied NLP-based latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) topic modeling to identify differences and similarities in patient and clinician participant interviews. Sentiment was defined as the sum of positive and negative words (each word with a +1 or -1 value). To assess utility, we used quantitative assessment questionnaires-System Usability Scale (SUS) and Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of use (USE). Finally, we used multivariate linear models-adjusting for age, sex, subject group (clinician vs patient), and development-to explore the association between sentiment analysis and SUS and USE outcomes.

resultsThe mean age of the 22 participants was 68 (SD 14) years, and 17 (77%) were female. The overall mean SUS and USE scores were 66.4 (SD 13.6) and 41.3 (SD 15.2), respectively. Both patients and clinicians provided valuable insights into the needs of older adults when designing and building an app. The mean positive-negative sentiment per sentence was 0.19 (SD 0.21) and 0.47 (SD 0.21) for patient and clinician interviews, respectively. We found a positive association with positive sentiment in an interview and SUS score (ß=1.38; 95% CI 0.37 to 2.39; P=.01). There was no significant association between sentiment and the USE score. The LDA analysis found no overlap between patients and clinicians in the 8 identified topics.

conclusionsInvolving patients and clinicians allowed us to design and build an app that is user friendly for older adults while supporting compliance. This is the first analysis using NLP and usability questionnaires in the quantification of user-centered design of technology for older adults.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsNatural Language ProcessingAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesaged adultsmobile phoneremote sensing technologysarcopeniatelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32540843
PMCPMC7442942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.