Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32540769›Full record

ArticleEpilepsy & behavior : E&B2020

Emergency implementation of telemedicine for epilepsy in Spain: Results of a survey during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Estefanía Conde-Blanco, María Centeno, Ester Tio, Desiree Muriana, Juan José García-Peñas, Pedro Serrano, Antonio Gil Nagel, Jose Serratosa, Ángeles Pérez Jiménez, Manuel Toledo and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsy & behavior : E&B, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. COVID-19, de novo seizures, and epilepsy: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The value of telephone consultations during COVID-19 pandemic. An observational study.QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians · 2021
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Estefanía Conde-BlancoHospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Epilepsy Study Group of the Catalan Neurological Society, Spanish Epilepsy Society, European Reference Network (ERN), Spain.
María CentenoHospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Epilepsy Study Group of the Catalan Neurological Society, Spanish Epilepsy Society, European Reference Network (ERN), Spain.
Ester TioHospital Universitari Parc Taulí, Epilepsy Study Group of the Catalan Neurological Society, Spain.
Desiree MurianaHospital de Mataró, Epilepsy Study Group of the Catalan Neurological Society, Spain.
Juan José García-PeñasHospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Spanish Epilepsy Society, Spain.
Pedro SerranoHospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Spanish Epilepsy Society, Spain.
Antonio Gil NagelHospital Ruber Internacional, Spanish Epilepsy Society, Spain.
Jose SerratosaHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Spanish Epilepsy Society, Spain.
Ángeles Pérez JiménezHospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Spanish Epilepsy Society, Spain.
Manuel ToledoHospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron, Spanish Epilepsy Society, Spain.
Antonio DonaireHospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Epilepsy Study Group of the Catalan Neurological Society, Spanish Epilepsy Society, European Reference Network (ERN), Spain.
Isabel ManzanaresHospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Epilepsy Study Group of the Catalan Neurological Society, Spanish Epilepsy Society, European Reference Network (ERN), Spain.
Olga BetránHospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Epilepsy Study Group of the Catalan Neurological Society, Spanish Epilepsy Society, European Reference Network (ERN), Spain.
Mar CarreñoHospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Epilepsy Study Group of the Catalan Neurological Society, Spanish Epilepsy Society, European Reference Network (ERN), Spain. Electronic address: mcarreno@clinic.cat.
Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús · ESCatalan Society of Family and Community Medicine · ESHospital de Mataró · ESHospital Regional Universitario de Málaga · ESHospital Ruber Internacional · ESHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teleneurology in Spain had not been implemented so far in clinical practice, except in urgent patients with stroke. Telemedicine was hardly used in epilepsy, and patients and neurologists usually preferred onsite visits. Our goal was to study impressions of adult and pediatric epileptologists about the use of telemedicine after emergent implementation during the new coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

methodsAn online survey was sent to the members of the Spanish Epilepsy Society and the members of the Epilepsy Study Group of the Catalan Neurological Society, inquiring about different aspects of telemedicine in epilepsy during the pandemic lockdown.

resultsA total of 66 neurologists responded, mostly adult neurologists (80.3%), the majority with a monographic epilepsy clinic (4 out of 5). Of all respondents, 59.1% reported to attend more than 20 patients with epilepsy (PWE) a week. During the pandemic, respondents handled their epilepsy clinics mainly with telephone calls (88%); only 4.5% used videoconference. Changes in antiseizure medications were performed less frequently than during onsite visits by 66.6% of the epileptologists. Scales were not administered during these visits, and certain types of information such as sudden expected unrelated death in epilepsy (SUDEP) were felt to be more appropriate to discuss in person. More than 4 out of 5 of the neurologists (84.8%) stated that they would be open to perform some telematic visits in the future.

conclusionsIn Spain, emergent implantation of teleneurology has shown to be appropriate for the care of many PWE. Technical improvements, extended use of videoconference and patient selection may improve results and patient and physician satisfaction.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralTelemedicineAdultCOVID-19Death, SuddenEmergency Service, HospitalEpilepsyHumansMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2SpainSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultEpilepsyPediatricTelemedicineTeleneurology

Identifiers

PMID32540769
PMCPMC7274642
OpenAlexW3033645508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.