ArticleJournal of pain and symptom management2020
Long-Term Prognosis of Older Adults Who Survive Emergency Mechanical Ventilation.
Article in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- One-Year Outcomes After ICU Discharge in Patients Aged 80 Years and Older: Functional and Clinical Factors Associated with Mortality in a Retrospective Observational Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Invasive ventilation and mortality in critically ill nonagenarians: a retrospective cohort study.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Applying lessons from limb muscle disuse and ageing to better understand ventilator-induced diaphragm dysfunction.Experimental physiology · 2025Review
- Shared Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatment: A Survey of Current Barriers in Practice Among Clinicians Across China.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Empower Emergency Physicians to Make Patient-Centered Recommendations Regarding Code Status With Serious Illness Communication Training-Resident-Desired, Standard of Emergency Care in 2023.Annals of emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
contextEmergent mechanical ventilation represents an important inflection point in seriously ill older adults' illness trajectories. Data are lacking on the long-term prognosis after surviving mechanical ventilation to inform shared decision making in serious illness conversations.
objectivesDescribe the long-term prognosis of older adults who survive emergency mechanical ventilation to inform shared decision making.
methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study from a single-center intensive care unit in an academic, urban, and tertiary care medical center. We included adults aged 75 years and older consecutively admitted with mechanical ventilation between 2008 and 2012 in the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring of Intensive Care III database. We excluded patients who were electively admitted. Our primary outcome was the long-term prognosis after leaving the hospital stratified by discharge location. Our secondary outcome was the frequency of documented serious illness conversations within 48 hours of hospitalization recommended by the National Quality Forum.
resultsWe identified 415 patients (454 hospital admissions) consecutively admitted to the intensive care unit. The median age was 82.6 years, 54.0% were female, 78.2% were white, non-Hispanic, and in-hospital mortality rate was 36.6%. Among the survivors, the median survival after hospital discharge was 163.5 days (interquartile range 37.5-476.8). Only 49.1% of patients had documented serious illness conversations within 48 hours of hospitalization. About 63.4% of patients (59 of 93) who were discharged to long-term acute care hospitals died by six months.
conclusionThis study demonstrated the long-term prognosis of older adults who underwent emergent mechanical ventilation. These data could be used to inform shared decision making in serious illness conversations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.