ArticleKidney international2020
Derivation and validation of genome-wide polygenic score for urinary tract stone diagnosis.
Article in Kidney international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trans-ancestry GWAS identifies 59 loci and improves risk prediction and fine-mapping for kidney stone disease.Nature communications · 2025Pooled it
- Kidney stone disease: risk factors, pathophysiology and management.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2025Review
- Variants of unknown significance are common in brushite stone formers undergoing genetic testing for nephrolithiasis.Urolithiasis · 2025Article
- Identification of aging-related biomarkers and immune infiltration analysis in renal stones by integrated bioinformatics analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Study protocol for a randomized single-center cross-over study: Dapagliflozin treatment in recurring kidney stone patients.PloS one · 2025Article
- Role of Genetic Testing in Kidney Stone Disease: A Narrative Review.Current urology reports · 2024Review
- The genetics of kidney stone disease and nephrocalcinosis.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2022Review
- Whole Exome Sequencing in a Population With Severe Congenital Anomalies of Kidney and Urinary Tract.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Derivation and Validation of Genome-Wide Polygenic Score for Ischemic Heart Failure.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Article
- Big Data Analytics in urology: the story so far and the road ahead.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
23 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Urinary tract stones have high heritability indicating a strong genetic component. However, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have uncovered only a few genome wide significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Polygenic risk scores (PRS) sum cumulative effect of many SNPs and shed light on underlying genetic architecture. Using GWAS summary statistics from 361,141 participants in the United Kingdom Biobank, we generated a PRS and determined association with stone diagnosis in 28,877 participants in the Mount Sinai BioMe Biobank. In BioMe (1,071 cases and 27,806 controls), for every standard deviation increase, we observed a significant increment in adjusted odds ratio of a factor of 1.2 (95% confidence interval 1.13-1.26). In comparison, a risk score comprised of GWAS significant SNPs was not significantly associated with diagnosis. After stratifying individuals into low and high-risk categories on clinical risk factors, there was a significant increment in adjusted odds ratio of 1.3 (1.12-1.6) in the low- and 1.2 (1.1-1.2) in the high-risk group for every standard deviation increment in PRS. In a 14,348-participant validation cohort (Penn Medicine Biobank), every standard deviation increment was associated with a significant adjusted odds ratio of 1.1 (1.03 - 1.2). Thus, a genome-wide PRS is associated with urinary tract stones overall and in the absence of known clinical risk factors and illustrates their complex polygenic architecture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.