ArticleContraception2020
Variation in effectiveness of planned postpartum contraception at two time points from prenatal to postpartum care.
Article in Contraception, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient Perspectives on Clinician Support When Pursuing Permanent Contraception in the United States.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2025Article
- Consistency of antenatal contraceptive plan and postpartum fulfillment in patients with opioid use disorder.Archives of women's mental health · 2024Article
- Addressing fluidity in contraceptive decision-making: a key component of patient-centered contraceptive counseling.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2022Article
- Ethics of a Mandatory Waiting Period for Female Sterilization.The Hastings Center report · 2022Review
- Shared Decision-Making: The Way Forward for Postpartum Contraceptive Counseling.Open access journal of contraception · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo identify characteristics of women who have consistent plans in terms of contraceptive effectiveness from antepartum to postpartum care. STUDY
designThis is a secondary analysis of a retrospective chart review of women who delivered at a single tertiary care center from 2012 to 2014. Preferred postpartum contraceptive plan was abstracted at three time points (prenatal care, hospital discharge, and outpatient postpartum care) and categorized into three tiers of effectiveness. We then examined consistency between the first two time points for the effectiveness in postpartum contraceptive method planned.
resultsOf the 8,394 women in the study cohort, 2,642 (31.5%) had a consistent postpartum contraceptive plan. Women who had a consistent plan were more likely to have higher parity (aOR 2.36, 95% CI 2.06-2.70 for parity 2+), choose highly effective methods of contraception (p < 0.001), achieve their contraception plan (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.16, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.85-2.52), but not more likely to have a subsequent pregnancy within 365 days of delivery (aOR 0.92, 95% CI 0.81-1.05).
conclusionBetter understanding contraceptive decision-making as a journey and removing external barriers during that process is a necessary component of pregnancy care. IMPLICATIONS: Counseling and documentation of contraceptive preferences throughout antepartum and postpartum care can help improve contraceptive outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.