SynthesisSurgery2020
Decision analysis and reinforcement learning in surgical decision-making.
Synthesis in Surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Present and future of machine learning in breast surgery: systematic review.The British journal of surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in breast surgery: Current applications, challenges, and future perspectives.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Review
- e-Health Strategy for Surgical Prioritization: A Methodology Based on Digital Twins and Reinforcement Learning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of the necessity for the surgical treatment of distal radius fractures.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Reinforcement Learning in Personalized Medicine: A Comprehensive Review of Treatment Optimization Strategies.Cureus · 2025Review
- Identifying acute illness phenotypes via deep temporal interpolation and clustering network on physiologic signatures.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Use of artificial intelligence in breast surgery: a narrative review.Gland surgery · 2024Review
- Advancements of Artificial Intelligence in Liver-Associated Diseases and Surgery.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Personalized decision-making for acute cholecystitis: Understanding surgeon judgment.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Article
- Reinforcement learning in surgery.Surgery · 2021Review
- Application of a Computerized Decision Support System to Develop Care Strategies for Elderly Hemodialysis Patients.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021Article
- Reinforcement Learning in Neurocritical and Neurosurgical Care: Principles and Possible Applications.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021Review
- Machine learning model MASKRCNN_RESNET50_FPN in image segmentation for the detection of the long head of biceps in arthroscopy images.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSurgical patients incur preventable harm from cognitive and judgment errors made under time constraints and uncertainty regarding patients' diagnoses and predicted response to treatment. Decision analysis and techniques of reinforcement learning theoretically can mitigate these challenges but are poorly understood and rarely used clinically. This review seeks to promote an understanding of decision analysis and reinforcement learning by describing their use in the context of surgical decision-making.
methodsCochrane, EMBASE, and PubMed databases were searched from their inception to June 2019. Included were 41 articles about cognitive and diagnostic errors, decision-making, decision analysis, and machine-learning. The articles were assimilated into relevant categories according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines.
resultsRequirements for time-consuming manual data entry and crude representations of individual patients and clinical context compromise many traditional decision-support tools. Decision analysis methods for calculating probability thresholds can inform population-based recommendations that jointly consider risks, benefits, costs, and patient values but lack precision for individual patient-centered decisions. Reinforcement learning, a machine-learning method that mimics human learning, can use a large set of patient-specific input data to identify actions yielding the greatest probability of achieving a goal. This methodology follows a sequence of events with uncertain conditions, offering potential advantages for personalized, patient-centered decision-making. Clinical application would require secure integration of multiple data sources and attention to ethical considerations regarding liability for errors and individual patient preferences.
conclusionTraditional decision-support tools are ill-equipped to accommodate time constraints and uncertainty regarding diagnoses and the predicted response to treatment, both of which often impair surgical decision-making. Decision analysis and reinforcement learning have the potential to play complementary roles in delivering high-value surgical care through sound judgment and optimal decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.