Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32539842›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2020

CO

Wen-Hui Zhang, Peng-Peng Ding, Lei Liu, Yan-Ling Wang, Wen-Hui Lai, Jing-Jing Han, Jun Han, Han-Wei Li

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wen-Hui ZhangDiagnosis and Treatment Center of Liver Cirrhosis, 302 Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China. zhangwenhui302@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3947-7706
Peng-Peng DingDiagnosis and Treatment Center of Liver Cirrhosis, 302 Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China.
Lei LiuDiagnosis and Treatment Center of Liver Cirrhosis, 302 Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China.
Yan-Ling WangDiagnosis and Treatment Center of Liver Cirrhosis, 302 Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China.
Wen-Hui LaiDiagnosis and Treatment Center of Liver Cirrhosis, 302 Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China.
Jing-Jing HanDiagnosis and Treatment Center of Liver Cirrhosis, 302 Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China.
Jun HanDiagnosis and Treatment Center of Liver Cirrhosis, 302 Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China.
Han-Wei LiDiagnosis and Treatment Center of Liver Cirrhosis, 302 Hospital of PLA, Beijing, China.
302 Military Hospital of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic biliary stenting by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the most common form of palliation for malignant hilar obstruction. However, ERCP in such cases is associated with a risk of cholangitis. The incidence of post-ERCP cholangitis is particularly high in Bismuth type IV hilar obstruction, and this risk is further increased when the contrast injected for cholangiography is not drained. The present study aims to compare the incidence of cholangitis associated with the use of a contrast agent, air and CO

methodsThe clinical data of consecutive 70 patients with type IV hilar obstruction, who underwent ERCP from October 2013 to November 2017, were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were divided into three groups based on the agent used for cholangiography: group A, contrast (n = 22); group B, air (n = 18); group C, CO

resultsAt baseline, there was no significant difference in terms of the patient's age, gender, symptoms and liver function tests among the three groups (P > 0.05). The complication rates were significantly higher in group A than in groups B and C (63.6% vs. 26.7 and 27.8%, P < 0.05). The incidence of post-ERCP cholangitis was significantly higher in group A (P < 0.05), while the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis and bleeding were similar in the three groups. After the ERCP, the mean hospital stay was shorter in groups B and C, when compared to group A (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the 30-day mortality rate among the three groups (P > 0.05). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between groups B and C in terms of primary end points.

conclusionCO

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCarbon DioxideCholangiographyCholangitisContrast MediaFemaleHumansIncidenceKlatskin TumorMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CarePneumoradiographyPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCarbon DioxideContrast MediaAir cholangiographyCholangitisCO2 cholangiographyContrast cholangiographyERCPHilar biliary obstruction

Identifiers

PMID32539842
PMCPMC7296950
OpenAlexW3034491869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.