Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32539830›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2020

Canine parvovirus: a predicting canine model for sepsis.

F Alves, S Prata, T Nunes, J Gomes, S Aguiar, F Aires da Silva, L Tavares, V Almeida, S Gil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Sepsis in Dogs and Cats-Consensus Definition and Clinical Criteria.Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)
    Pooled it
  2. Septic Shock and Prognosis in Dogs and Cats With Sepsis-Consensus Definition and Clinical Criteria.Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

F AlvesFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, ULisboa, Av. Universidade Técnica, 1300-477, Lisboa, Portugal.
S PrataFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, ULisboa, Av. Universidade Técnica, 1300-477, Lisboa, Portugal.
T NunesFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, ULisboa, Av. Universidade Técnica, 1300-477, Lisboa, Portugal.
J GomesVeterinary Teaching Hospital, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, ULisboa, Av. Universidade Técnica, 1300-477, Lisboa, Portugal.
S AguiarFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, ULisboa, Av. Universidade Técnica, 1300-477, Lisboa, Portugal.
F Aires da SilvaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, ULisboa, Av. Universidade Técnica, 1300-477, Lisboa, Portugal.
L TavaresFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, ULisboa, Av. Universidade Técnica, 1300-477, Lisboa, Portugal.
V AlmeidaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, ULisboa, Av. Universidade Técnica, 1300-477, Lisboa, Portugal.
S GilFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, ULisboa, Av. Universidade Técnica, 1300-477, Lisboa, Portugal. solange@fmv.ulisboa.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9565-6261

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) DL57/2016/CP1438/CT0002Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) Project UID/CVT/276/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is a severe condition associated with high prevalence and mortality rates. Parvovirus enteritis is a predisposing factor for sepsis, as it promotes intestinal bacterial translocation and severe immunosuppression. This makes dogs infected by parvovirus a suitable study population as far as sepsis is concerned. The main objective of the present study was to evaluate the differences between two sets of SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome) criteria in outcome prediction: SIRS 1991 and SIRS 2001. The possibility of stratifying and classifying septic dogs was assessed using a proposed animal adapted PIRO (Predisposition, Infection, Response and Organ dysfunction) scoring system.

resultsThe 72 dogs enrolled in this study were scored for each of the PIRO elements, except for Infection, as all were considered to have the same infection score, and subjected to two sets of SIRS criteria, in order to measure their correlation with the outcome. Concerning SIRS criteria, it was found that the proposed alterations on SIRS 2001 (capillary refill time or mucous membrane colour alteration) were significantly associated with the outcome (OR = 4.09, p < 0.05), contrasting with the 1991 SIRS criteria (p = 0.352) that did not correlate with the outcome. No significant statistical association was found between Predisposition (p = 1), Response (p = 0.1135), Organ dysfunction (p = 0.1135), total PIRO score (p = 0.093) and outcome. To explore the possibility of using the SIRS criteria as a fast decision-making tool, a Fast-and-Frugal tree (FFT) was created with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 29%.

conclusionThese results suggest that increasing the SIRS criteria specificity may improve their prognostic value and their clinical usefulness. In order to improve the proposed PIRO scoring system outcome prediction ability, more specific criteria should be added, mainly inflammatory and organ dysfunction biomarkers.

Indexed as

Parvovirus, CanineAnimalsDog DiseasesDogsEnteritisFemaleMaleParvoviridae InfectionsPrognosisSepsisSeverity of Illness IndexSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeCanine parvovirusPIROSepsisSIRS

Identifiers

PMID32539830
PMCPMC7294767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.