Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32539780›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2020

Healthy aging through the lens of community-based practitioners: a focus group study.

Rubee Dev, Oleg Zaslavsky, Barbara Cochrane, Thomas Eagen, Nancy F Woods

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Understanding perspectives on health-promoting behaviours among older adults with hypertension.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Healthy Aging in the Time of Corona Pandemic.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rubee DevSun Yat-sen University Global Health Institute, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Xingang West Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China. meetrubss@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1853-9728
Oleg ZaslavskyBiobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Barbara CochraneChild, Family, and Population Health Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Thomas EagenRehabilitation Science and Health Systems & Policy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nancy F WoodsBiobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · USSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

de Tornyay Center for Healthy Aging, University of Washington N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNearly one in every seven Americans is 65 years and older, facing day-to-day challenge of aging. Although interest in healthy aging is growing, most of the efforts are directed towards understanding the perceptions of older adults. Little is known about the perspectives of community-based practitioners who work with older adults and deliver programs to promote healthy aging. The purpose of this project was to expand knowledge on healthy aging by exploring the perspectives of community-based practitioners working directly with older adults.

methodsWe purposively sampled community-based practitioners (n = 12, including nurses, physician, social workers, and other community services professionals) working with older adults, who then participated in one of three in-depth focus group discussions conducted between March and June 2016. Each focus group discussion lasted for about 2 h. Verbatim transcript data were analyzed in Atlas.ti 7 using a conventional content analysis with an inductive approach, and consensual validation of coding was achieved.

resultsThree core categories of healthy aging were identified: (1) characteristics of healthy aging; (2) healthy aging attainment; and (3) programs and activities for healthy aging. Practitioners identified a number of characteristics of healthy aging under person-specific (physiological, basic, psych-emotional, and cognitive needs), social aspects (creating community and contributing to the community), and spiritual dimensions (cultural views and beliefs) of healthy aging. Healthy aging attainment was represented as facilitators and barriers both with respect to care recipients and care providers, and programs and activities through promoting fitness and wellness.

conclusionsThe rapidly changing demographics and aging population in the United States and their various needs suggest the implications for recognizing opportunities and developing and implementing programs to promote healthy aging. Although practitioners' perspectives had some overlap with traditional research and medical views on healthy aging, the unique and holistic conceptual framework derived in the study might provide a more refined foundation for delivering appropriate health care services to the American aging population.

Indexed as

Healthy AgingAgedAgingExerciseFocus GroupsHumansUnited StatesCommunity-based practitionerFocus group discussionHealthy agingPerspective

Identifiers

PMID32539780
PMCPMC7296747
OpenAlexW3034473037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.