Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32539725›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2020

Is humane slaughtering of rainbow trout achieved in conventional production chains in Germany? Results of a pilot field and laboratory study.

Verena Jung-Schroers, Uta Hildebrandt, Karina Retter, Karl-Heinz Esser, John Hellmann, Dirk Willem Kleingeld, Karl Rohn, Dieter Steinhagen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Development of Welfare Protocols at Slaughter in Farmed Fish.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Verena Jung-SchroersFish Disease Research Unit, Institute for Parasitology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17, D-30559, Hannover, Germany.
Uta HildebrandtFish Disease Research Unit, Institute for Parasitology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17, D-30559, Hannover, Germany.
Karina RetterFish Disease Research Unit, Institute for Parasitology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17, D-30559, Hannover, Germany.
Karl-Heinz EsserInstitute of Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17, D-30559, Hannover, Germany.
John HellmannFish Disease Research Unit, Institute for Parasitology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17, D-30559, Hannover, Germany.
Dirk Willem KleingeldLower Saxony State Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety, Veterinary Task-Force, Eintrachtweg 19, D-30173, Hannover, Germany.
Karl RohnInstitute for Biometry, Epidemiology, and Information Processing, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Dieter SteinhagenFish Disease Research Unit, Institute for Parasitology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17, D-30559, Hannover, Germany. dieter.steinhagen@tiho-hannover.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2303-8533
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DELower Saxony State Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety · DE

Funding

Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung 2813MDT903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, is an important fish in European freshwater aquaculture. This industry sector is dominated by small family-owned enterprises located in rural areas. A large percentage of rainbow trout produced by these small enterprises is marketed directly and killed on demand and not processed in commercial processing plants. EU and national regulations stipulate that fish shall be stunned prior to killing and slaughter. The overall objective of this study was to monitor how stunning interventions were integrated into the production chains of German conventional trout aquaculture in order to safeguard animal welfare during stunning and killing. For this, the stunning and slaughtering processes were monitored on 18 rainbow trout farms in various German federal states. During the on-farm research, (i) the stunning success, (ii) injuries related to the stunning procedure, (iii) duration between stunning and killing, and (iv) visible responses at the time of slaughtering were assessed as welfare indicators. In addition, haematological and biochemical blood parameters were measured as indicators for physiological stress. Due to the fact that stunning interventions should induce a loss of consciousness in fish, in a laboratory study, it was examined whether the absence of the brainstem/ behavioural responses, opercular movements (OM) or eye-rolling reflex (vestibulo-ocular reflex, VOR) was correlated with the stage of insensibility.

resultsThe majority of rainbow trout farms applied manual percussion (38%) or electrical stunning (48%), while on 14% of the farms, the fish were stunned by electrical stunning which was immediately followed by manual percussion. After percussive stunning, about 92.3% of the rainbow trout displayed no OM or VOR as brainstem/ behavioural indicators of consciousness. This percentage varied on farms which applied electrical stunning. While on the majority of farms, 95 to 100% of the fish were unconscious according to the observation of brainstem/ behavioural indicators, the stunning intervention was less effective on farms where rainbow trout were stunned at current densities below 0.1 A dm

conclusionsIn conventional aquaculture, rainbow trout can effectively be stunned by manual percussion or electrical stunning. Consciousness can be monitored by the absence of opercular movements or the eye-rolling reflex, which are lost approximately at the same time as neurological responses like VER. For safeguarding animal welfare during stunning and killing of rainbow trout in conventional production processes, the stunning process requires careful attention and the operating personnel need to be trained in using the stunning devices and recognising indicators of consciousness.

Indexed as

Animal WelfareAbattoirsAnimalsAquacultureElectroshockEvoked Potentials, VisualGermanyOncorhynchus mykissPilot ProjectsUnconsciousnessAnimal welfareConventional productionRainbow troutStunning proceduresVisually-evoked responses

Identifiers

PMID32539725
PMCPMC7296641
OpenAlexW3034210059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.