ArticleRadiology2020
Case 279: Central-Variant Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome.
Article in Radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Consecutive PRES and diffuse alveolar hemorrhage in a patient with active lupus nephritis and antiphospholipid antibodies: a case report and systematic literature review.BMC nephrology · 2026Pooled it
- The Central Variant of Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Neurology international · 2025Review
- Unveiling the link: Takayasu arteritis manifesting as posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging patterns and perfusion changes of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in children with clinical outcome correlation.Pediatric radiology · 2024Observational
- Article
- Central-variant posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in an infant with mid-aortic syndrome: A rare case of symmetric basal ganglia lesions.Radiology case reports · 2022Article
- Central variant reversible encephalopathy syndrome.BMJ case reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
HistoryA 25-year-old woman with recently diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus and class IV lupus nephritis confirmed with biopsy and treated with mycophenolate mofetil presented with a 2-day history of progressively worsening edema of her face and lower extremities. She had no antecedent infection or vaccination. She was admitted to the hospital and treated with methylprednisolone, furosemide, and C1 esterase inhibitor. On hospital day 2, she experienced a witnessed generalized tonic-clonic seizure. At that time, she became hypoxic and was intubated for airway protection. Her laboratory study results preceding the seizure were remarkable for hyponatremia, with a blood sodium level of 122 mEq/L (122 mmol/L) (normal range, 135-145 mEq/L [134-145 mmol/L]), which was corrected to 137 mEq/L (137 mmol/L) over 48 hours. Same-day cerebrospinal fluid analysis was unremarkable, and unenhanced head CT findings (not shown) were normal, with no evidence of intracranial hemorrhage or edema.Her subsequent hospital course was complicated by renal failure requiring continuous renal replacement therapy, hypertension (systolic blood pressure ranging from 140 to 190 mm Hg), anemia requiring blood transfusions, thrombocytopenia, and pneumonia. She remained intubated with a limited neurologic examination due to sedative medications until hospital day 10. After extubation, she was noted to have a right gaze preference. She was able to speak in short phrases and follow simple commands. Neurologic examination was notable for drowsiness, right gaze deviation, direction-changing torsional nystagmus, horizontal ophthalmoplegia, and generalized symmetric weakness without upper motor neuron signs. The following day (hospital day 11), unenhanced MRI of the brain was performed along with MR angiography of the brain. Biopsy of the temporal artery was normal, without evidence of inflammation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.