ArticleAnnals of laboratory medicine2020
Exploration and Validation of the Performance of Hemoglobin A1c in Detecting Diabetes in Community-Dwellers With Hypertension.
Article in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dose-response relationship between the postload-fasting gap and the risk of developing diabetes: a cohort study from multiple centers in China.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2025Article
- The impact of glycated hemoglobin trajectories on hypertension risk: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Association between night blindness history and risk of diabetes in the Chinese population: a multi-center, cross sectional study.BMC endocrine disorders · 2024Article
- Association of single nucleotide polymorphisms with dyslipidemia and risk of metabolic disorders in the State of Qatar.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2023Article
- Rapid estimation approach for glycosylated serum protein of human serum based on the combination of deep learning and TD-NMR technology.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2023Article
- Relationship of Glycated Hemoglobin A1c with All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality among Patients with Hypertension.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Prevalence of Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Chinese Community-Dwelling Adults with and without Diabetes.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Cholecystectomy is associated with dysglycaemia: Cross-sectional and prospective analyses.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2022Article
- Four-year changes in central fatness, risk of diabetes, and metabolic control in older adults: a cohort study with mediation analysis.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2022Article
- An Algorithm for the Noninvasive and Personalized Measurement of Microvascular Blood Viscosity Using Physiological Parameters.BioMed research international · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetes can complicate hypertension management by increasing the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality. Studies targeting diabetes detection in hypertensive individuals demonstrating an increased risk of diabetes are lacking. We aimed to assess the performance of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and its cut-off point in detecting diabetes in the abovementioned population.
methodsData from 4,096 community-dwellers with hypertension but without known diabetes were obtained from the Study on Evaluation of iNnovated Screening tools and determInation of optimal diagnostic cut-off points for type 2 diaBetes in Chinese muLti-Ethnic (SENSIBLE) study; these data were randomly split into exploration (70% of the sample) and internal validation (the remaining 30%) datasets. The optimal HbA1c cut-off point was derived from the exploration dataset and externally validated using another dataset from 2,431 hypertensive individuals. The oral glucose tolerance test was considered the gold-standard for confirming diabetes.
resultsThe areas under the ROC curves for HbA1c to detect diabetes were 0.842, 0.832, and 0.829 for the exploration, internal validation, and external validation datasets, respectively. An optimal HbA1c cut-off point of 5.8% (40 mmol/mol) yielded a sensitivity of 76.2% and a specificity of 74.5%. Individuals who were not diagnosed as having diabetes by HbA1c at 5.8% (40 mmol/mol) had a lower 10-year CVD risk score than those diagnosed as having diabetes (P=0.01). HbA1c≤5.1% (32 mmol/mol) and ≥6.4% (46 mmol/mol) could indicate the absence and presence of diabetes, respectively.
conclusionsHbA1c could detect diabetes effectively in community-dwellers with hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.