Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32539251›Full record

ArticleInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Development and validation a task-specific checklist for a microsurgical varicocelectomy simulation model.

Marcelo Esteves Chaves Campos, Marcelo Magaldi Ribeiro de Oliveira, Augusto Barbosa Reis, Lilian Bambirra de Assis, Viacheslav Iremashvili

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Residency training for minimally invasive surgery.Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2022
    Observational
  6. Increase in submissions to International Brazilian Journal of Urology during Covid-19 quarentine.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marcelo Esteves Chaves CamposDepartamento de Cirurgia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Marcelo Magaldi Ribeiro de OliveiraDepartamento de Cirurgia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Augusto Barbosa ReisDepartamento de Cirurgia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Lilian Bambirra de AssisDepartamento de Ciências Sociais Aplicadas, CEFET, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Viacheslav IremashviliDepartment of Urology, United Hospital Center, Bridgeport, West Virginia, USA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop and validate a new test of specific technical skills required for microsurgical varicocelectomy. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn electronic questionnaire was sent to 558 members of the Brazilian Society of Urology for the validation of the task-specific checklist (TSC) for assessment of microsurgical varicocelectomy. Participants who had experience in this procedure were selected as judges. For construct validation, 12 participants including attending urologists and urological residents in training were recruited for voluntary participation. We formed a group of three experts and a group of nine novices, who had to perform the steps of microsurgical varicocelectomy on a simulation model using human placenta. Each participant was filmed and two blinded raters would then evaluate their performance using the TSC of microsurgical varicocelectomy.

results14 judges were recruited. The assessment tool was reformulated, according to the judges suggestions and had the content validity achieved. The final version of the TSC was comprised of the task-specific score, a series of 4 items scored in a binary fashion designed for microscopic sub-inguinal varicocelectomy. The differences between the performance of participants with different levels of experience reflected the construct validity. The reliability between the raters was high. The mean time required to complete the training of microsurgical varicocelectomy in simulation model was significantly shorter for experts compared to novices (201 vs. 496 seconds, p=0.01).

conclusionsThis preliminary study suggests that the task-specific checklist of microsurgical varicocelectomy is reliable and valid in assessing microsurgical skills.

Indexed as

ChecklistMicrosurgeryBrazilClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansPregnancyReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesEducational MeasurementMicrosurgerySimulation Training

Identifiers

PMID32539251
PMCPMC7822372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.