ArticlePsycho-oncology2020
Daily received support and relational functioning in HCT survivors and their caregivers.
Article in Psycho-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Daily received support and relational functioning in HCT survivors and their caregivers.Psycho-oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesNumerous authors have expressed their interest in adjustment and social support in the context of cancer. However, none of the previous studies has directly examined the models describing the links between daily social support and adjustment fluctuation, particularly at the relational level. This study aimed to verify the additive and buffering models of daily received support regarding the relational level of patient-caregiver relationship, that is, the relationship-related stress and relationship satisfaction following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT).
methodsTwo hundred patient-caregiver dyads participated in a 28-day diary study that was started on the first day after post-HCT discharge. The participants rated the extent of daily relationship-related stress, relationship satisfaction, and received support every evening during the study. The analyses were based on the actor-partner interdependence moderation model.
resultsDaily deviations in received support were directly associated with concurrent and lagged daily deviations in relationship satisfaction, regardless of relationship-related stress level in both patients and caregivers. In addition, in caregivers, the effect of daily deviations in received support on relationship satisfaction depended on deviations in relationship-related stress and was significant on the days with higher relationship-related stress.
conclusionsThe findings supported both the additive (in patients and caregivers) and the buffering hypotheses (in caregivers) of daily received support in patient-caregiver dyads during the first month following HCT. The theoretical and practical implications of the findings are further highlighted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.