ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2020
Morphological Differences in the Inferior Oblique Muscles from Subjects with Over-elevation in Adduction.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bupivacaine-Induced Regeneration in Rabbit Extraocular Muscles: Implications for the Treatment of Strabismus.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Effects of fibroblast growth factor 2 on muscle precursor cells from mouse limb and extraocular muscle.PloS one · 2026Article
- Gene expression profiling of extraocular muscles in primary inferior oblique overaction.PeerJ · 2025Article
- Spontaneous Recovery of Inferior Oblique Overaction in Three Saudi Children: A Case Report.Cureus · 2023Article
- Effect of Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 on Extraocular Muscle Structure and Function.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021Article
- Extraocular muscles in patients with infantile nystagmus: adaptations at the effector level.Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960) · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: We examined inferior oblique muscles from subjects with over-elevation in adduction for characteristics that might shed light on the potential mechanisms for their abnormal eye position. Methods: The inferior oblique muscles were obtained at the time of surgery in subjects diagnosed with either primary inferior oblique overaction or Apert syndrome. The muscles were frozen and processed for morphometric analysis of myofiber size, central nucleation, myosin heavy chain (MyHC) isoform expression, nerve density, and numbers of neuromuscular junctions per muscle section. Results: The inferior oblique muscles from subjects with Apert Syndrome were smaller, and had a much more heterogeneous profile relative to myofiber cross-sectional area compared to controls. Increased central nucleation in the Apert syndrome muscles suggested on-going myofiber regeneration or reinnervation over time. Complex changes were seen in the MyHC isoform patterns that would predict slower and more sustained contractions than in the control muscles. Nerve fiber densities were significantly increased compared to controls for the muscles with primary inferior oblique overaction and Apert syndrome that had no prior surgery. The muscles from Apert syndrome subjects as well as those with primary inferior oblique overaction with no prior surgery had significantly elevated numbers of neuromuscular junctions relative to the whole muscle area. Conclusions: The muscles from both sets of subjects were significantly different from control muscles in a number of properties examined. These data support the view that despite similar manifestations of eye misalignment, the potential mechanism behind the strabismus in these subjects is significantly different.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.