Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32539079›Full record

Trial reportJAMA neurology2020

Hookworm Treatment for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Radu Tanasescu, Christopher R Tench, Cris S Constantinescu, Gary Telford, Sonika Singh, Nanci Frakich, David Onion, Dorothee P Auer, Bruno Gran, Nikos Evangelou and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01470521 (Worms for Immune Regulation of Multiple Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01470521 phase2completednot on this map

Worms for Immune Regulation of Multiple Sclerosis (WIRMS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of NottinghamRan2011 to 2016Enrolled72ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingArmsHookworm larvae, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Thinking outside the brain: Gut microbiome influence on innate immunity within neurodegenerative disease.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The neurotropic schistosomeParasitology · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Radu TanasescuDivision of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England.
Christopher R TenchDivision of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England.
Cris S ConstantinescuDivision of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England.
Gary TelfordImmune Regulation Research Group, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England.
Sonika SinghDivision of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England.
Nanci FrakichDivision of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England.
David OnionFlow Cytometry Facilities, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England.
Dorothee P AuerDivision of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England.
Bruno GranDivision of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England.
Nikos EvangelouDivision of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England.
Yasser FalahDivision of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England.
Colin RanshawImmune Regulation Research Group, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England.
Cinzia CantacessiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
Timothy P JenkinsDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
David I PritchardImmune Regulation Research Group, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England.
University of Nottingham · GBNottingham Biomedical Research Centre · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBImmune Regulation (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Studies suggest gut worms induce immune responses that can protect against multiple sclerosis (MS). To our knowledge, there are no controlled treatment trials with helminth in MS. Objective: To determine whether hookworm treatment has effects on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity and T regulatory cells in relapsing MS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 9-month double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted between September 2012 and March 2016 in a modified intention-to-treat population (the data were analyzed June 2018) at the University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, a single tertiary referral center. Patients aged 18 to 61 years with relapsing MS without disease-modifying treatment were recruited from the MS clinic. Seventy-three patients were screened; of these, 71 were recruited (2 ineligible/declined). Interventions: Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either 25 Necator americanus larvae transcutaneously or placebo. The MRI scans were performed monthly during months 3 to 9 and 3 months posttreatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the cumulative number of new/enlarging T2/new enhancing T1 lesions at month 9. The secondary end point was the percentage of cluster of differentiation (CD) 4+CD25highCD127negT regulatory cells in peripheral blood. Results: Patients (mean [SD] age, 45 [9.5] years; 50 women [71%]) were randomized to receive hookworm (35 [49.3%]) or placebo (36 [50.7%]). Sixty-six patients (93.0%) completed the trial. The median cumulative numbers of new/enlarging/enhancing lesions were not significantly different between the groups by preplanned Mann-Whitney U tests, which lose power with tied data (high number of zeroactivity MRIs in the hookworm group, 18/35 [51.4%] vs 10/36 [27.8%] in the placebo group). The percentage of CD4+CD25highCD127negT cells increased at month 9 in the hookworm group (hookworm, 32 [4.4%]; placebo, 34 [3.9%]; P = .01). No patients withdrew because of adverse effects. There were no differences in adverse events between groups except more application-site skin discomfort in the hookworm group (82% vs 28%). There were 5 relapses (14.3%) in the hookworm group vs 11 (30.6%) receiving placebo. Conclusions and Relevance: Treatment with hookworm was safe and well tolerated. The primary outcome did not reach significance, likely because of a low level of disease activity. Hookworm infection increased T regulatory cells, suggesting an immunobiological effect of hookworm. It appears that a living organism can precipitate immunoregulatory changes that may affect MS disease activity. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01470521.

Indexed as

Hookworm InfectionsNecator americanusT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryAdultAnimalsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLarvaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingOutcome Assessment, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID32539079
PMCPMC7296452
OpenAlexW3035168462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.