Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32538925›Full record

ArticleJNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association2020

Prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus among People Attending Medical Camp in a Community Hospital.

Anu Kushwaha, Anuj Raj Kadel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anu KushwahaDepartment of Emergency Medicine and General Practice, Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital, Sinamangal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Anuj Raj KadelKathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital, Duwakot, Bhaktapur, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDiabetes is a health problem on the rise in developing countries like Nepal. Often in the suburban and rural areas, patients are diagnosed in the late stages with complications. The aim of this study is to find out the prevalence of diabetes type 2 in a community hospital of Nepal.

methodsThis is a descriptive cross-sectional study done in a community hospital from January to March of 2019 after ethical clearance (Registration number: 150320192) from the institutional review committee of Kathmandu Medical College. Convenient sampling technique was used. Glucometer using glucose sticks is used to measure random blood sugar level and relevant questions were asked in a short interview. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 20 version.

resultsOut of a total of 114 people, the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus was 5 (4.38%). Among those 5 (4.385%) people with type 2 diabetes mellitus, 2 (1.75%) were female and 3 (2.63%) were male. The minimum age of the patient was 17 years and the maximum age was 92 years. Five out of 95 patients with mild physical activity had random blood sugar more than 200 mg/dl and five out of 46 alcoholic patients had random blood sugar levels more than 200 mg/dl. Only 1 out of 26 smokers had a random blood sugar level of more than 200 mg/dl.

conclusionsPrevalence of diabetes mellitus type 2 in our study population is quite high. Early detection of diabetes mellitus type 2 can be a good screening tool for early treatment and prevention of complications.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlcoholismCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitals, CommunityHumansMaleMiddle AgedNepalPrevalenceYoung Adultdiabetes mellitus; prevalence; screening.

Identifiers

PMID32538925
PMCPMC7654473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.