Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32538252›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)2021

Acute effects of MDMA on trust, cooperative behaviour and empathy: A double-blind, placebo-controlled experiment.

Anna Borissova, Bart Ferguson, Matthew B Wall, Celia Ja Morgan, Robin L Carhart-Harris, Mark Bolstridge, Michael Ap Bloomfield, Tim M Williams, Amanda Feilding, Kevin Murphy and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Not so great expectations: The role of price and name information in the nocebo effect.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The intersection of empathy and addiction.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna BorissovaClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3847-8512
Bart FergusonUMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Matthew B WallClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, UCL, London, UK.
Celia Ja MorganPsychopharmacology and Addiction Research Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Robin L Carhart-HarrisNeuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6062-7150
Mark BolstridgeNeuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Michael Ap BloomfieldClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1972-4610
Tim M WilliamsNeuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Amanda FeildingBeckley Foundation, Oxford, UK.
Kevin MurphyCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, Cardiff, UK.
Robin J TyackeNeuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK.
David ErritzoeNeuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7022-6211
Lorna StewartClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, UCL, London, UK.
Kim WolffSchool of Biomedical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
David NuttNeuropsychopharmacology Unit, Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK.
H Valerie CurranClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, UCL, London, UK.
Will LawnClinical Psychopharmacology Unit, UCL, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0143-2724
Imperial College London · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity College Hospital · GBBeckley Foundation · GBCardiff University · GBInvicro (United Kingdom) · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is being actively researched as an adjunct to psychotherapy. It may be beneficial to trust, empathy and cooperative behaviour due to its acute prosocial effects.

aimTo test (a) the acute effects of MDMA on measures of empathy, trust and cooperative behaviour, and (b) subacute changes in mood three days after MDMA administration.

methodsTwenty-five participants (

resultsMDMA acutely increased self-reported 'closeness to others' and 'euphoria' and increased plasma concentrations of MDMA. MDMA did not significantly change task-based empathy, trust or cooperative behaviour. Using Bayesian analyses, we found evidence that MDMA and placebo did not differ in their effects on empathy and cooperative behaviour. MDMA did not significantly change subacute mood and this was supported by our Bayesian analyses.

conclusionDespite augmentation in plasma MDMA levels and subjective drug effects, we found no increase in prosocial behaviour in a laboratory setting.

Indexed as

AdultAffectBayes TheoremCooperative BehaviorDouble-Blind MethodEmpathyFemaleHallucinogensHumansMaleMiddle AgedN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamineSocial BehaviorTrustYoung AdultHallucinogensN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetaminecooperative behaviourempathyMDMAprosocialtrust

Identifiers

PMID32538252
PMCPMC8155732
OpenAlexW3034423620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.