Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32538030›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and global health2020

Top Ethical Issues Concerning Healthcare Providers Working in Saudi Arabia.

Amar Mansour Almoallem, Mohammed Abdulaziz Almudayfir, Yassar H Al-Jahdail, Anwar E Ahmed, Adnan Al-Shaikh, Salim Baharoon, Abdullah AlHarbi, Hamdan Al-Jahdali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ethical Dilemmas in Plastic Surgery: Insights From a Survey Study in Saudi Arabia.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amar Mansour AlmoallemCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh.
Mohammed Abdulaziz AlmudayfirCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh.
Yassar H Al-JahdailCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh.
Anwar E AhmedCollege of Public Health and Health Informatics, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh.
Adnan Al-ShaikhCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh.
Salim BaharoonCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh.
Abdullah AlHarbiCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh.
Hamdan Al-JahdaliCollege of Medicine, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare providers working in Saudi Arabia come from various nationalities, cultures, and training backgrounds. This study aimed to assess the perceptions of healthcare providers working in Riyadh hospitals about ethical dilemmas and solutions.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional study among physicians working in Riyadh's private and governmental hospitals between June and December 2017. The study collected information on demographics, knowledge about medical ethics, the sources of such knowledge, and common ethical issues in general and the top ethical issues and dilemmas encountered in their daily practice.

resultsA total of 455 physicians from government and private hospitals were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the participants was 34.29 ± 10.5 years, females were 29.7% and mean years of practice was 13.0 ± 11.5. The top ethical issues identified by the participants were "disagreement with the patients' relatives about treatment" (91%), patient disagreement with decisions made by professionals (84%), treating the incompetent patient (79%), conflict with administration policy and procedures (77%), scarcity of resources (72%), and making decision about do-not-resuscitate or life-sustaining treatment (68%). There were significant differences in dealing with ethical issues in relation to gender, confidence about ethical knowledge, nationality, seniority, training site, and private or government hospitals academic and nonacademic.

conclusionHealthcare providers in Riyadh hospitals face multiple ethical challenges. In addition to improvement in ethics knowledge through educational program among healthcare professional, there is a valid need for healthcare professionals and other sectors within society to engage in serious and continuous dialogue to address these issues and propose recommendations.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEthics, MedicalPhysiciansAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitalsHumansMaleSaudi ArabiaYoung Adultbioethicsethical dilemmaethical issuesEthicshealth carehealth care professionalsSaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID32538030
PMCPMC7310778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.