Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32537572›Full record

ArticlePRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)2019

The Persistence of Specialty Disrespect: Student Perspectives.

Michael Alston, Jeanne Cawse-Lucas, Lauren S Hughes, Tyler Wheeler, Amanda Kost

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Just family doctors: Hidden curriculum against family medicine in medical schools.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  7. The praxis of generalism in family medicine: Six concepts (6Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael AlstonUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle, WA.
Jeanne Cawse-LucasUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Lauren S HughesPennsylvania Department of Health, Harrisburg, PA.
Tyler WheelerFamily Practice Center, Atlanta, GA.
Amanda KostDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
University of Washington · USPennsylvania Department of Health · USThe Family Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOne aspect of the hidden curriculum of medicine is specialty disrespect (SD)-an expressed lack of respect among medical specialties that occurs at all levels of training and across geographic, demographic, and professional boundaries, with quantifiable impacts on student well-being and career decision making. This study sought to identify medical students' perceptions of and responses to SD in the learning environment.

methodsWe conducted quantitative and content analysis of an annual survey collected between 2008 and 2012 from 702 third- and fourth-year students at the University of Washington School of Medicine. We describe the frequency of reported SD, its self-rated impact on student specialty choice, and major descriptive categories.

resultsNearly 80% of respondents reported experiencing SD in the previous year. A moderate or strong impact on specialty choice was reported by 25.9% of respondents. In our sample, students matching into family medicine, obstetrics/gynecology, and emergency medicine were most likely to report exposure. Content analysis identified two new concepts not previously reported. Internecine strife describes students distancing themselves from both disrespecting and disrespected specialties, while legitimacy questions the validity of the targeted specialty.

conclusionsSD is a consistent and ubiquitous part of clinical training that pushes students away from both disrespecting and disrespected specialties. These results emphasize the need for solutions aimed at minimizing disrespect and mitigating its effects upon students.

Identifiers

PMID32537572
PMCPMC7205122
OpenAlexW2908717858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.